Leaders Engagement in Mothers’ Matters
Written by Emma Sheppard
Emma founded The MTPT Project, the UK's charity for parent teachers, in 2016 when on maternity leave with her first child. She has 12 years experience as an English teacher, Lead Practitioner and ITT Lead, and now runs The MTPT Project full time.
At The MTPT Project, we take our commitment to inclusion seriously. As Founder, I love reviewing our data annually for our Diversity and Inclusion report, the way that this informs our strategies as a small charity and the impact this then goes on to have.
One of these strategies to come out of our 2023-24 report was to improve engagement tracking at events directed to leaders in our sector. We are curious to know whether our work is perceived – in broad terms – as workforce and retention or diversity and mothers.
It makes sense that our programmes aimed at staff who are parents attract an overwhelmingly female audience. Because of our national and sector parenting policies, mothers are still afforded more paid time on birthing maternity leave than fathers and non-birthing partners, and this is when gendered routines around parenting take root and influence the division of domestic and professional labour in the long term – particularly in heterosexual couples.
Our leadership work, however, is aimed at senior leaders and above. Statistically, these are positions where men are over-represented at both primary and secondary level. If our work is (correctly) seen as workforce and retention, then up to 60% of our audience at these events should be men.
At this mid-point in the year, then, how far do school leaders still consider the retention, progression and wellbeing of parent-teachers as a ‘mothers matter’?
We’ve tracked data over 15 events – most of which have been optional to attend – aimed at school and systems leaders, and this is what we’ve found:
- On average, just 17% of attendees at these events have been men
- On three occasions, there has not been a single male face in the room
- Three events have hit our starter target of 24% male representation (the proportion of men in the wider teacher workforce, not at leadership level) and these were events billed as retention, flexible working, or an obligatory meeting for local headteachers
We count a number of men within our professional network who show up regularly to champion the work that we do. They sign off funding, make introductions, speak up on behalf of our community, work on research and data projects, platform our work on social media and speak at our events.
But men are not showing up enough as audience members to learn about the daily, and systems-wide practice that can be implemented to support working mothers for the overall health of our workforce and – ultimately – the schools they are leading.
An acute example of this disconnect: 22% of the speakers at The MTPT Project’s Missing Mothers conference are fathers and leaders from our community, but – two weeks ahead of the event – not one of the 135 ticket holders are men.
When organisations are considered who is “best placed” to attend MTPT events, the data suggests that they are still sending leaders with first-hand experience of motherhood. Clearly, the view is that these mothers’ matters are best handled between mothers and by mothers.
Statistically, however, these mothers, sorting things out between themselves, are less likely to be in leadership positions than men. They are less likely to wield decision-making power and they are less able to role model effective allyship to other men.
If we really want to make a sustainable difference to the teacher retention crisis, our male leaders need to stop seeing mothers as a diversity group, and instead know that mothers are workforce.
To Belong Is Not Enough: Why We Must Move Towards Mattering
Written by Mohamed Abdallah
With almost two decades of experience, Mohamed started his journey in youth work and pupil referral units before spearheading groundbreaking inclusive practices and systems as a leader in an 'Outstanding' all-through mainstream school. Driven by a relentless commitment to positive change, Mohamed now dedicates his efforts to collaborating with school leaders across the nation as the Head of the Inclusive Leadership Course at The Difference.
“No one would care if I weren’t here.”
I can remember the words hitting me hard. As Designated Safeguarding Lead there were immediate red flags, but on a human level it broke my heart.
100% attendance, great progress, and never in trouble. On paper he belonged – but in reality he thought nobody cared.
Across the country, I hear the language of belonging increasingly referenced in discussions about student engagement, wellbeing, and success. And I welcome it. It’s a refreshing shift in our narrative about the student experience.
Still, something didn’t feel right. Then, it clicked.
It is not enough to simply belong; you should also matter.
My experience has shown me that a student can belong to a school community without ever feeling that their presence or contributions truly matter. A friend recently shared a US study with me that revealed a surprising finding: a sense of ‘belonging’ to a school community did not significantly affect academic performance. But instead there were other factors that determined success, such as participation and self regulated learning.
Think about it this way: You belong to a gym, but do the regulars know your name? You belong to a workplace, but do your ideas shape the way things are done? You belong to a school, but when you are absent, is there a noticeable void?
Mattering is more than belonging to a place or a community; it is about your significance.
One of the most prominent academic advocates for mattering is the US community psychologist Isaac Prilleltensky. He argues that developing a strong sense of mattering depends on two things: feeling you are valued, and feeling that you add value – whether that be within your workplace, your community, your family, or your friendship group. In the UK, my good friend Luke Billingham has been one of the most influential thinkers and writers on young people and mattering.
The Three Components of Mattering in Schools
After multiple voice notes back and forth, Luke and I sat down to discuss this matter (see what I did there!), and we asked:
If a student stopped coming to school tomorrow, would they feel like their absence was noticed?
Does every student have positive and affirming relationships with peers and at least one adult?
Are students actively shaping the school environment, or are they simply complying with expectations?
These questions helped us think more deeply about mattering. Of course, students should belong. But would we be satisfied as school leaders with 100% attendance, high attainment, and zero suspensions, yet students still told us, “No one would care if I weren’t here”?
They should feel they matter.
Reflecting on our experiences in different schools, Luke and I identified some key factors which we think enable students to develop mattering; Voice, Relationships, and Participation.
- Voice: Too often, schools claim to prioritise student voice while keeping real decision-making at the leadership level. But voice is not just about being heard. Schools must embed student experience and perspectives into decision-making, not just through surveys, but by creating opportunities for meaningful dialogue and change. Even when student perspectives challenge us, they offer uncomfortable truths we must engage with. When students see their input shape school culture, they matter.
- Relationships: A student might belong to a school, but do they have relationships that affirm their worth? Schools could cultivate opportunities for positive peer relationships to create strong social bonds, and to ensure every student has at least one trusted adult. Relationships built on trust and recognition, and environments where students feel valued and connected.
- Participation: Mattering isn’t just about feeling noticed, it’s about feeling needed. Students need opportunities to contribute meaningfully to their school communities. This goes beyond enrichment clubs; it means ensuring that students are actively shaping their environments. Whether through student-led campaigns, or engaging with the local community, authentic participation allows students to see their impact.
Why Mattering Matters for Inclusion
I worry that belonging is being used as a catch-all solution for inclusion, or dare I say it, a form of soft inclusion. For many students from marginalised backgrounds, belonging can feel conditional. They may be required to turn up, but do they feel like their presence and identity are essential? Do they see themselves reflected in the curriculum? Are their voices shaping school systems? Are their experiences acknowledged and valued?
Mattering addresses these questions by ensuring that students are not just included, but recognised as integral members of their schools. For students from underrepresented backgrounds, the feeling of mattering can be a protective factor against marginalisation and disengagement.
If we stop at belonging, we risk creating schools where students exist but don’t thrive, they comply but are disengaged, are included but unseen. The real challenge for schools isn’t just inclusion. It’s significance. Instead of asking, ‘Do our students belong?’ ask, ‘Do they know they matter?’
World Book Day 2025
Written by Robert Davies
Rob Davies is Associate Assistant Headteacher at Calderstones School in Liverpool. This role involves leading on anti-racism in education, sharing practical strategies, reflections, and initiatives to create a more inclusive, representative, and equitable school. He shares insights on decolonising the curriculum, diversifying reading materials, and fostering anti-racist practices in schools.
Another year, another World Book Day—same costumes, same characters. Harry and Hermione? Check. Little Red Riding Hood? Of course. The Gruffalo? Naturally. And let’s not forget Mrs. Trunchbull, stomping through the halls. Sound familiar? Thought so.
But here’s the thing—World Book Day can be so much more. It’s time to move beyond the usual suspects and reimagine it through a truly diverse lens. Let’s make it an event where every student sees themselves in the stories we celebrate.
Every year, World Book Day celebrates the magic of stories. But whose stories are we telling? Who do they inspire? When books and characters overwhelmingly reflect white, middle-class experiences, whose voices are missing? Are we selecting a diverse range of books that offer all children equitable opportunities to see themselves?
If not, isn’t it just Book Day?
At its core, World Book Day aims to “promote reading for pleasure, offering every child and young person the opportunity to have a book of their own.” But if we fail to approach it through an anti-racist lens, are we truly serving all students?
The Representation Gap in Children’s Books
In the UK, 33.5% of school-aged children come from ethnic minority backgrounds. Yet, between 2017 and 2019, only 7% of children’s books featured characters from these cultures—and just 5% had a Black, Asian, or Minority Ethnic main character.
Research shows that when children see themselves in books, it shapes their sense of identity and possibility.
Despite limited representation, excellent books exist that help students feel seen, foster belonging, and cultivate a love of reading. But do schools actively seek them out?
The issue goes beyond just introducing diverse books. What if teachers haven’t read them, or don’t understand their significance?
Whose culture has capital?
With a predominantly white teaching workforce (Runnymede Trust, 2020), how often is World Book Day shaped through an anti-racist lens? One of the biggest motivators for reading is emotion—how books make us feel (Dungworth et al., 2004). Naturally, educators promote books that resonated with them in childhood, shaped by their own experiences.
If most books being championed reflect the same narrow cultural perspectives, what message does that send? Who do these books inspire—and who gets left out?
Research further supports this. More children from ethnic minority backgrounds than white backgrounds say they don’t see themselves in what they read (40% vs. 30.5%), with Black students feeling this most acutely.
Making It a World Book Day
If World Book Day is to truly reflect all students, schools must take active steps to make it more inclusive. That’s exactly what we did at Calderstones School this year.
As one of Liverpool’s largest secondary comprehensive schools, diversity is our strength. But we recognised that World Book Day needed to reflect that diversity, ensuring all students felt represented and engaged.
So, we embraced the ‘world’ in World Book Day. We focused on books and authors from a variety of cultures and languages, fostering conversations about students’ mother tongues and cultural backgrounds.
We collaborated with Greenbank Primary School and Leeds Beckett University to involve primary school students and Global Ambassadors. Together, they read books from their home countries in their native languages—including Arabic, Basque, Farsi, French, Greek, Mandarin, Polish, Russian, Urdu, and more.
By showcasing this linguistic and cultural diversity, we highlighted the vital importance of representation in education. The readings were recorded, edited, and shared on the school’s social media. The response? Overwhelmingly positive. For many in our community, this was the first time their language and heritage were visibly celebrated in school.
How to Rethink World Book Day in Your School
If we are serious about delivering a truly inclusive World Book Day, here’s lets start with the following: 1. Move Beyond the Same Old Costumes
Rather than dressing up as characters from GCSE texts, consider why these books dominate the curriculum. Less than 1% of GCSE students study a book by a writer of colour—so why reproduce that marginalisation on World Book Day?
- Conduct a Student Voice
Ask students:
- What books would you love to explore?
- Do you see your culture and heritage reflected in the school library?
- What stories are missing from the shelves?
- Use these insights to shape book selections and discussions.
- Explore Translated Literature
Many beloved English books originated in other languages—Pinocchio was originally Italian. What other global stories could students discover? World Book Day can be an opportunity to highlight the rich traditions of storytelling from around the world.
Final Thought: A Call to Action
By embracing the ‘world’ in World Book Day, we made it more meaningful for our students. This is a step in the right direction—but it can’t stop here. Schools must challenge traditional reading lists, elevate diverse voices, and ensure that every child sees themselves in the stories they read.
We can’t diversify the teaching workforce overnight, but we can broaden our thinking. We must ensure that we view events like World Book Day through an anti-racist lens.
Because if World Book Day doesn’t include all stories, is it really World Book Day at all?
From Lettuce to Leadership: The Recipe for Real DEIB in Schools
Written by Sharon Warmington
Sharon is a diversity of race advocate and trainer, and CEO of the National Black Governors Network. She is an experienced academy trustee and school governor, corporate governance specialist. As an international Governance Practitioner and local school Governor, Sharon Warmington is also a public speaker, facilitator and a strategic leader, having worked nationally and internationally on projects in the private, public and third sector.
The room fell silent. A lone voice cut through the air like a scalpel.
“If we always do what we’ve always done, we’ll always get what we’ve always got.”
A murmur of agreement rippled across the table, but the truth hung heavy. Governance in education wasn’t evolving fast enough. The diversity deficit on school boards was glaring, and yet the solution was tantalisingly within reach.
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB). A well-rehearsed mantra, a neatly arranged acronym, but in practice? Too often, it was all lettuce—bland, predictable, offering little more than a base layer. And just like a dull, uninspired salad, governance without true DEIB lacked texture, colour, and depth.
The First Ingredient: Diversity
Imagine stepping into a kitchen with only one ingredient. The outcome is predictable—uninspiring, repetitive, and ultimately ineffective. The same is true for governance.
Without representation across different racial, ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic groups, leadership decisions are made in an echo chamber. Diversity isn’t a ‘nice-to-have’; it’s the foundation upon which every other principle of DEIB is built. Without it, equity and inclusion remain unattainable.
The Dressing: Equity
Equity isn’t about throwing different ingredients into the mix and hoping for the best. It’s about recognising that some have been denied access to the kitchen entirely.
A governing board dominated by a single demographic can never truly understand the systemic barriers faced by underrepresented communities. Equity means creating real opportunities, ensuring those at the table have the tools, training, and access they need to contribute meaningfully.
It’s the dressing that brings balance—without it, even the freshest ingredients fail to shine.
The Crunch: Inclusion
Diversity and equity alone are not enough. Inclusion is the crunch, the bite, the assurance that every voice at the table is not just heard but valued.
A tokenistic approach—where individuals from diverse backgrounds are present but sidelined—rings hollow. Effective governance ensures all voices are not just present but shape the conversation. That means active listening, real participation, and a culture where speaking up is met with action, not silence.
The Secret Ingredient: Belonging
The final element, the one that brings it all together, is belonging.
A salad with great ingredients but no harmony is still a mess. The same applies to governance. If board members feel like outsiders—constantly having to prove their worth, explain their existence, or justify their perspectives—then DEIB has failed.
Belonging is the ultimate goal. It’s the point where leaders no longer ‘accommodate’ difference but celebrate it. It’s where representation is no longer an initiative but an expectation.
The Governance Gap: A Recipe for Change
The Department for Education (DfE) mandates that schools and trusts prioritise diversity in governance. The Public Sector Equality Duty requires active promotion of equality and inclusion. And yet, how many governing boards truly reflect the communities they serve?
The data tells its own story. Governing boards remain overwhelmingly white, predominantly male, and heavily weighted towards those over 50. Meanwhile, young voices, Black and Asian perspectives, and disabled representation remain painfully absent.
The solution? A new approach.
Turning Theory into Action
If schools are serious about DEIB, they must move beyond rhetoric. This means:
- Mapping the gaps: Who is missing from your governing board?
- Expanding the search: Looking beyond the usual networks—engaging with Black professional groups, student unions, disability organisations.
- Creating real pathways: Making governance accessible for those who may never have considered it.
DEIB isn’t about optics—it’s about outcomes. Schools with diverse governance bodies are better equipped to navigate the complexities of modern education. They make stronger decisions, build more inclusive policies, and ultimately create better environments for students.
The Call to Action
So, the question isn’t whether DEIB is important—it’s whether we’re brave enough to do the work.
Are we prepared to step beyond our comfort zones? To challenge long-standing norms? To build governing boards that truly represent the schools they serve?
The choice is ours. We can keep serving up plain lettuce, or we can create something extraordinary.
Diversifying English Literature texts: Five ways to get your schools to invest
Written by Jessica Tacon
Jessica Tacon is second in charge of the English Department at City of London Academy Highgate Hill and is a member of NATE’s (National Association for the Teaching of English) ‘Reviewing Literature’ working group. She created The Right Writing campaign which aims to improve racial diversity in English Education.
The title of this piece reflects an ongoing challenge in education, but also an opportunity. While many schools and educators have made strides in diversifying their English curricula, there’s always room for progress. Students across the country deserve to see themselves reflected in the texts they study, while also being exposed to a wide range of perspectives. Diverse literature enriches learning experiences, fosters empathy, and ensures every student feels valued.
Here’s a brief overview of why a diverse and inclusive curriculum is essential:
- Representation matters: Research by Penguin Random House revealed that many students never study a text by a writer of colour, apart from a few poems in their GCSE studies. They also found that only 7% of students study a text by a woman, and just 0.1% study a text by a woman of colour. Every child deserves to see their experiences and identities reflected in what they read. Not only does this enhance engagement and enjoyment, but it can also lead to better academic outcomes.
- Retention in English Studies: When students don’t see themselves or diverse perspectives in their English lessons, they may perceive the subject as irrelevant. This may lead to a drop in the number of students pursuing English at A-level, which in turn impacts representation in higher education and English-related fields. A diverse curriculum can break this cycle by making the subject more relatable and meaningful.
- Broadening horizons: While representation is crucial, it’s equally important to introduce students to experiences, cultures, and voices beyond their own. Literature has always been a bridge to other worlds, offering insights into lives that differ from our own. This is a fundamental aspect of fostering curiosity and empathy in young people.
- Addressing historical imbalances: Historically, the English curriculum has often overlooked diverse voices. As educators, we have the opportunity (and responsibility) to address these imbalances and create and embed a curriculum that is inclusive, honest, and representative of a wide range of experiences.
Despite these clear benefits, the teaching of a diverse and inclusive range of literature texts isn’t yet the norm in all schools.
Support (and essential investment) is needed from senior leads in schools, and multi-academy trusts, to make this a reality. It is challenging as individuals may not be English specialists, but the points above highlight how a change in English can have a far-reaching impact on young people.
With this in mind, I would like to explore the common barriers to change and five solution-focused strategies to help schools embrace a more inclusive curriculum.
Strategies
Strategy 1: Emphasise the positive impact on students
Barrier: Leadership may focus on the potential challenges rather than the benefits of inclusivity.
Solution: Highlight the research-backed benefits of a diverse curriculum. For instance, the research by Penguin Random House shows students are more engaged when they see themselves reflected in their studies, and they perform better academically. Explain how inclusive texts also broaden students’ horizons, fostering empathy and critical thinking by exposing them to new perspectives and cultures. Frame change as being much less of a risk than continuing to teach a set of texts which actually may be disengaging students in the English classroom.
Message for leadership: A diverse curriculum creates a more engaged and motivated student body, which translates to higher achievement and a stronger school culture.
Strategy 2: Frame diversity as a shared responsibility
Barrier: Leaders may feel diversity initiatives are an additional challenge in an already complex system.
Solution: Present inclusivity as a professional and moral responsibility to address historical imbalances in education. Position the school as a leader in creating a curriculum that prepares students for life in a diverse and interconnected world.
Message for leadership: Diversity isn’t just a ‘nice-to-have’; it’s essential for fostering a fair and well-rounded education. Implementing an inclusive curriculum aligns with the school’s duty to provide all students with an equitable experience.
Strategy 3: Offer practical solutions to time and workload challenges
Barrier: Leaders may worry that introducing new texts will increase workload for already overstretched staff.
Solution: Reassure them that high-quality, ready-to-use resources are available. Platforms like BBC Bitesize offer support materials on a range of texts including some recently added to diversify exam board text options, such as My Name is Leon and Leave Taking. BBC Bitesize, as its name suggests, is a great jump-off point for exploring a diverse range of texts by breaking them down into manageable chunks.
Message for leadership: Implementing an inclusive curriculum doesn’t need to add extra strain. Leverage existing resources and expert support to streamline the process.
Strategy 4: Address staff confidence with professional development
Barrier: Some educators may feel unprepared to teach unfamiliar texts or discuss sensitive topics.
Solution: Advocate for investment in professional development such as training sessions or workshops that help staff gain confidence in teaching diverse texts. Highlight that introducing new material can be professionally invigorating, offering opportunities for growth and fresh perspectives. For instance, one text added to AQA’s English Literature GCSE as part of their diversity drive is Princess and the Hustler by Chinonyerem Odimba. It’s a modern, engaging text that explores rich themes, literary techniques, and historical context, making it a rewarding teaching (and learning) experience.
Message for leadership: Building staff confidence through professional development ensures successful implementation while reinvigorating teaching practices.
Strategy 5: Present change as achievable and incremental
Barrier: Leaders may see curriculum reform as an overwhelming, all-or-nothing process.
Solution: If this is the case, advocate for a phased approach, starting with small but meaningful changes (such as introducing one or two new texts). You could suggest piloting new texts with specific classes before scaling up.
Message for leadership: Curriculum change doesn’t need to happen all at once. An incremental approach makes the process manageable while demonstrating the positive impact of inclusive texts.
Looking ahead
It’s important to acknowledge that change in education is rarely quick or easy. However, the potential benefits far outweigh the challenges. A truly diverse and inclusive curriculum not only enriches students’ academic experiences but also prepares them to navigate an increasingly interconnected world.
Of course, diversifying texts is just one part of creating an inclusive school environment. Staff training, teaching approaches, and the broader school culture all play critical roles in ensuring that diversity is embedded meaningfully and authentically.
Every student deserves an education that values their identity and broadens their horizons. As we move forward, let’s commit to making this vision a reality.
To access the BBC Bitesize GCSE English Literature collection, please visit: https://rebrand.ly/7d51da
Breaking Barriers: The Transformative Effect of Black Educators in Leadership
Written by Krystian McInnis
Krystian McInnis is a Religious Education consultant, advisor, and researcher specialising in decolonising and diversifying Religious Education. With a career that spans the public, private, and charity sectors, he brings extensive national and international experience in curriculum diversification and decolonisation. As the Co-Founder of Reimagining Education, Krystian is dedicated to creating a more inclusive and equitable educational system where everyone feels seen, heard, and that they belong.
One percent. This is the stark figure of Black Headteachers in England with a slight increase to 1.3% for Deputy Headteachers, compared to 92.5% and 90.8% respectively for White British equivalent (DfE, 2023). With many of the positions held by Black senior leaders highly concentrated within inner London, the figures decline as we venture further afield from the capital, with the northeast of England the worst affected, where whilst children of Black-African origin make up 1.3 per cent of the student population, just 0.1 per cent of the region’s teachers identify in the same way (Gorard et al. 2023).
The data is there for all to see, and whilst the conversation about change has been ongoing for many years, with copious localised initiatives to address the issue, the results appear the same, with little momentum or genuine centralised government appetite for structural or transformative change. Whilst the implementation of short
lived ‘successful’ localised responses to this historic problem has led some to herald this as progress, worthy of celebration, I think it pertinent that we ask ourselves the following questions:
- How much work, dedication and strategic planning did it take for us to reach this mere one percent?
- What are the systemic barriers contributing to the underrepresentation of Black Headteachers and Deputy Headteachers, and how can they be effectively addressed?
- If achieving racial equity is a sincere aim that we are striving towards, why have we become comfortable with tokenistic adulations, for results that quite frankly fall below mediocre?
Navigating the Leadership Ladder: Obstacles for Black Educators in Advancing
The underrepresentation of Black educators in senior leadership roles is not due to a lack of eNort or ambition among teachers. In fact, Black teachers have repeatedly demonstrated a strong desire to attain leadership positions. Evidence shows that Black teachers nationally are able to successfully navigate to middle leadership, but the cliN that appears in front of them when stepping into senior leadership, is one that many fall oN (NfER, 2020). It seems there is little room for their presence around senior leadership tables, with many only able to sit on the periphery in newly formed roles such as secondee, associate assistant head or under the guise of being part of an ‘extended’ leadership team. The illustrious title of Assistant Headteacher or Assistant Principal, as the first step in senior leadership, appears for many, out of their reach. The actuality of one step forward, two steps back is far too apparent. Good enough to take on additional workload, but not good enough to be part of the substantive team.
Teacher Diversity and Its Impact on Student Experiences
Underrepresentation of Black teachers has been disproportionately low for decades in the UK and despite Black people making up 4.6% of the working age population, only 2.5% of teachers identify as Black (Glowach et al. 2023). The issues that arise however, are plenty. Gorard (2018) found that one of the downsides to a lack of ethnic minority teachers is the real possibility that this underrepresentation is not only having a negative effect on educational processes but on student outcomes too.
Beyond just students outcome however, what is interesting to note, is that ethnic minority students with similarly ethnic minority teachers are often less likely to be seen as disruptive (Dee, 2005), be referred for disciplinary reasons, be excluded (Grissom et al., 2009, Lindsay and Hart, 2017), or suspended from school (Gordon et al. 2023, Wright, 2015). With suspension rates at an all-time high (Busby, 2024), along with the fact that Black children are up to six times more likely to be excluded from school than their White peers (McIntyre et al. 2021), it appears clear that the recruiting of teachers from racially diverse backgrounds, might in fact help with this current crisis we find ourselves within.
Furthermore, even more intriguing, is that students with teachers from similar ethnic backgrounds to their own are also less likely to be classified as requiring special education (Stiefel et al., 2022) and in fact, where ethnic minority students have teachers of a similar ethnic minority to their own, they are more likely to be referred to a gifted programme (Grissom and Redding, 2016, Grissom et al., 2017, Ofori, 2023, Egalite and Kisida, 2016). Please note, this is not to suggest that students are being wrongly diagnosed by professionals, but rather creates a space for questions to be further explored. Historically however, the misdiagnosis of students from ethnic minority backgrounds was certainly the case, specifically those of Caribbean ancestry. The seminal work by Bernard Coard, ‘How the West Indian Child is Made Educationally Subnormal in the British School System’, written in 1971, explored the educational inequalities within the British educational system and found that West Indian students were disproportionately represented and often wrongly enrolled in ‘educationally subnormal’ schools. 50 years on, it appears this legacy continues.
Moving Beyond Tokenism: The Role of White Allies in Educational Reform
Now, allow for there to be no confusion to the argument being made. An increase in Black teachers and leaders is no silver bullet. It will not solve the abundance of issues within the educational system nor is there a golden percentage to be achieved. What it required, however, are meaningful steps in the right direction, the removal of barriers, and for many more White leaders and allies to go beyond mere rhetoric and delve into the world of action.
Whilst reviewing recruitment policies are fundamental, these are often used as a delay tactic to consciously, or subconsciously, buy time before genuine action is taken. With continuous delays and excuses, the cultural masquerading in many schools is far too prevalent. One of BHM celebrations, the monotonous assembly being delivered year after year on MLK Jr or Rosa Parks, where the only information changed is the date, or posters scarcely scattered about the school building pinned up, only to be pulled down on the Friday before the half term break, shoved back into a dark cupboard for another year. This must change. Note, I am not suggesting that these celebrations should not take place, but rather, they must be part of wider school initiatives instead of a plaster, attempting to cover over a gushing wound.
From Rhetoric to Reality: Creating Pathways from Middle to Senior Leadership
Delay tactics must be abandoned. Whilst many schools move towards actively considering the diversity of their workforce and have a staffing body that reflects the community they serve, much more work is required than to add a tokenistic phrase ‘we encourage applications from diverse candidates’ within job advertisements or the belief that by removing names from CVs all issues are solved in eliminating biases within recruitment processes. Schools must step out of their comfort zones on how they have always done things, a way which is no longer working (and arguably never has), and actively seek and develop talent. The time has come for leaders to go beyond providing a mere TLR to the only ethnic member of staff in the school to oversee all things diversity, as they are ‘the best fit’, and ensure it becomes part of the larger conversation around the leadership table.
For substantial and sustainable change to take place, leadership teams must collaborate with teachers and external organisations who in many instances, with the greatest of respect, are more knowledgeable than they are in areas such as this. Peaking over the horizon however, help is on the way. Through forward thinking initiatives such as the Leaders Like Us programme and Aspiring Heads programme to name a few, the current landscape supporting senior leaders from GMH backgrounds is shifting.
Therefore, as we move towards a brighter and more equitable future, I leave the following questions for you to ponder:
- In what ways does your organisation address and dismantle barriers that may hinder the advancement of minority ethnic teachers into leadership roles?
- What partnerships or collaborations do you have in place to support the leadership development of teachers from minority ethnic backgrounds?
- How are you ensuring your organisation is not pushing diverse talent of the middle leader to senior leadership cliff, but rather building a bridge for them to cross?
References:
Busby, E. (2024) Exclusions and suspensions hit record high as warning issued to all schools, Independent, Available at:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/school-exclusions-suspensions figures-record-b2581943.html
Dee, T. F. (2005) A Teacher Like Me: Does Race, Ethnicity, or Gender Matter? The American Economic Review 95(2): 158–165.
DfE (2023) School teacher workforce, Available at: https://www.ethnicity-facts figures.service.gov.uk/workforce-and-business/workforce-diversity/school-teacher workforce/latest/#full-page-history
Demie, F., Kulwinder, M., Race, R. (2023) Ethnic inequality in the teaching workforce in schools: Why it matters, BERA
Egalite, A. J., Kisida, B. (2016) The Many Ways Teacher Diversity May Benefit Students, Education Next 24(3)
Glowach, T., Richards, M., Mitchell, R. (2023) More ethnic minority teachers are needed in UK schools – but teaching can affect their mental health and wellbeing, School of Education University of Bristol
Gorard, S. (2018) Education Policy. Bristol: Policy Press
Gorard, S., Chen, W., Tan, Y., Huat See, B., Gazmuri, C., Tereschchenko, A., Demie, F., Siddiqui, N. (2023) The disproportionality of ethnic minority teachers in England: trends, patterns, and problems, Routledge Open Research, 13(2) 1-28.
Grissom J., & Redding C. (2016) Discretion and Disproportionality: Explaining The Underrepresentation of High-Achieving Students of Color In Gifted Programs, AERA.
Grissom J., Nicholson-Crotty J., Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2009) Race, Region, and Representative Bureaucracy Public Adm Review; 69: 911–919.
Grissom J., Rodriguez L., Kern E. (2017) Teacher And Principal Diversity And The Representation Of Students Of Color In Gifted Programs, The University of Chicago Press, 117(3).
Lindsay, C. A., & Hart, C. M. D. (2017) Exposure to same-race teachers and student disciplinary outcomes for Black students in North Carolina, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 485–510.
McIntyre, N., Parveen, N., Thomas, T. (2021) Exclusion rates five times higher for black Caribbean pupils in parts of England, The Guardian, Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/mar/24/exclusion-rates-black caribbean-pupils-england
NfER; Kettlewell, K., Lucas, M., McCrone, T., Liht, J., & Sims, D. (2020) School and trust governance investigative report: October 2020, London: Department for Education
Ofori, M. (2023) Lack of diversity in teaching in England means minority ethnic pupils miss out, The Guardian, Available at:
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/aug/29/lack-diversity-teaching-means minority-ethnic-pupils-england-miss-out
Stiefel L., Syeda S., Cimpian J., O;Hagan, K. (2022) The Role of School Context in Explaining Racial Disproportionality in Special Education, EdWorkingPaper: 22-661.
White, N. (2024) No Black or Asian teachers in more than half of English primary schools, report finds, Independent, Available at:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/no-black-asian-teachers-england primary-schools-b2544072.html
Wright, A. (2015) Teachers’ perceptions of students’ disruptive behavior: The Effect of Racial Congruence and Consequences for School Suspension, Association for Education Finance and Policy Annual Conference.
Inclusive Recruitment: 20 Tips to Consider
Written by Hannah Wilson
Founder of Diverse Educators
‘Diversifying Recruitment’ and ‘Inclusive Recruitment’ are two terms that we often hear being mentioned frequently in education circles, but what is the difference in approach?
Diverse or diversifying suggests the focus is on finding diverse candidates. Inclusive or ‘inclusifying’ (phrase coined by Professor Paul Miller which we have adopted) suggests the focus is instead on including diverse candidates. A subtle and nuanced difference which makes the commitment more authentic and meaningful for all parties.
As fans of Simon Sinek’s ‘Golden Circle’ from his TED Talk: ‘Start With Why’, we would suggest that you start in your thinking and in your discussions as an educational employer, by using the model (Golden Circle = Why > How > What) to map out and align the purpose of recruiting differently.
Example 1:
- Why do we want to diversify our staff body?
- How diverse is our community and how does this compare to our various stakeholder groups?
- What impact/ legacy are we striving for by diversifying our staff?
Example 2:
- Why do we want to make our recruitment process more inclusive?
- How inclusive are our existing policies, processes and practices?
- What is the impact of a more inclusive approach to our recruitment and to our workplace?
The clarity of understanding what we are trying to change and why we are trying to change it, is an important starting point in transforming how we do things. Moreover, becoming more conscious, confident and competent in identifying and removing/ reducing existing barriers facing candidates in the recruitment process is an ongoing training priority.
A shared understanding, a shared language and a shared approach will lead to a greater consistency in experience for all.
Some key language to consider and explore:
- ‘Unconscious bias’ – have we discussed this in advance of starting a recruitment process and have key stakeholders had training?
- ‘Glass ceiling’ – are we aware of where this sits above the women in education in the system and in our own organisation?
- ‘Concrete ceiling’ – are we aware of where this sits about the people of colour in education in the system and in our own organisation?
Moreover, have we discussed, are we values-aligned and do we have a strategic approach when it comes to topics such as flexible working and the pay gap?
We get asked a lot to support schools, colleges and trusts in their approach to recruitment, but the request is often too late in the process to make a real difference and to make changes meaningful. There are some quick wins you can make in the short term to create a more inclusive recruitment process and experience, but really this needs to be a medium to long term project and we need to be planning for Summer 2025 and Autumn 2025 activities to get us better prepared for the Spring 2026 recruitment.
Here are 20 tips to reflect on and discuss with colleagues:
Tip 1: Review the JD & PS – particularly look at what is down as being ‘desirable’ v ‘essential’ as some people will not apply if they do not meet all of the criteria. We are creating false barriers e.g. you must have the NASENCO or NPQH award to apply for this job is incorrect – they can be working towards it or start it once appointed.
Tip 2: Review the Job Advert – screen the wording for bias and especially review any gendered language. Some language choices will suggest only a certain type of candidate should apply e.g. for headship a leader ‘with gravitas’ might lead to more male candidates applying.
Tip 3: Articulate your DEIB Commitment – consider where in the initial documentation would a candidate know that you are on a DEIB journey and truly committed to change as an organisation. Do you have a DEIB statement that can be lifted and included? A policy and/ or a DEIB action plan that can be hyperlinked?
Tip 4: Share your Commitment to Flexible Working – research shows us that by mentioning an openness to flexible working you get an increase in applicants. Since the Flexible Working Bill was passed the system has had to consider flexible working as a recruitment tool as well as a retention tool. Make it explicit from the beginning of the process what might be possible so candidates do not waste your time and you do not waste their time either!
Tip 5: Consider where to Advertise – if we keep doing the same we will keep getting the same. Some Jobs Boards are very expensive and draw a certain audience. Diversifying where you are advertising can also lead to you finding more diverse candidates. E.g. for governance you can post adverts in special interest Linkedin groups and networks such as Black Governors Network.
Tip 6: Consider who is Sharing the Advert and where / to who – recruitment needs to become a team sport and not just the work of HR. If your staff are outward facing and are on socials, ask them to share opportunities with their networks. Push it beyond the immediate network around the organisation to find people beyond that.
Tip 7: Review the Application Form – you might already be doing all of the above and wondering why it is not working, but have you looked at the fields the candidate has to complete at application level and the information they have to read as often forms are out of date and undermine the DEIB work that is happening e.g. asking a question like What is your gender? With binary answers like M/F. How would someone trans or non-binary complete this question? How might this put off trans allies from applying too?
Tip 8: Review your ‘Shop Window’ – your organisation’s website and your social media accounts also need reviewing and updating so everything is harmonised. If you are saying in the call to action you are interested in hearing from diverse candidates who reflect the diversity of the local community, but your website imagery does not reflect this it creates dissonance. If the person running the social media accounts has not been briefed and is only amplifying white, male thought leaders and people who share exclusionary content online, this will contradict the DEIB commitment you have articulated and this will lead to further self deselection.
Tip 9: Create a ‘Blank’ Selection Process – lots of organisations pride themselves on running ‘blind’ recruitment processes. Consider how ableist this language is and how it might undermine your commitment to DEIB. Is there another way of sharing what you are doing to try to remove bias in the process from blanking out names, race, age, salaries and institutions candidates have worked/ studied at?
Tip 10: Diversify who is Involved in the Long and Short Listing Process – bias creeps in as soon as applicants start arriving. Different people reviewing and handling the applications will have their own biases around spelling, punctuation and grammar, around font choice and formatting, around language choices before you even start digging into the details. Consider who is involved in creating and applying the selection criteria and how you score the application.
Tip 11: Articulate in the Invitation to Interview what Support is Available – instead of waiting for diversity to wave at you and say ‘hey, I am different and need this from you…’ consider leading with what you can offer as adjustments and support, and share this with all candidates. E.g. On the day you will have access to allocated parking, a lift, a quiet room, a prayer room… we serve Halal food in our school kitchen. People will feel more comfortable confirming what they need to thrive at the interview, but this will also show all candidates that you are fully committed to inclusion.
Tip 12: Send out Interview Questions out in Advance – many institutions are now sending questions out in advance to support neurodivergent applicants with processing time. But this approach also benefits other candidates including those who are less confident, introverted or who have had some time out of the system. Everyone will perform better! There are concerns that people will cheat and use ChatGTP to craft responses but we will be able to identify a contrived response and interrogate further.
Tip 13: Create an Accessible and Inclusive Interview Experience – ensure the interview format, tasks and briefing documents are accessible for all candidates, thus removing any barriers. Build in a task or a question to check for values alignment to your organisational commitment to DEIB. Values tasks can be scenario-based but can also be sent out in advance to reflect on and prepare as a pre-task to share at the interview.
Tip 14: Consider all of the Candidate Touchstones – curate the range of people that the candidates will interact with at each point of the process from ringing up to book a visit, coming for a pre-interview tour, to the day itself and communications from the HR lead before, during and after. Where are the opportunities for candidates to see themselves and other diverse identities in the process?
Tip 15: Be Authentic and Honest, Avoid Being Performative – we get regular feedback from candidates that they appreciate transparency from prospective employers. If an organisation can identify and articulate their gaps/ shortcomings this acknowledges that they are aware of their gaps and they want to do better in representing the diversity of their community in the diversity of the staff body. We are also aware that some organisations use stock images of diverse staff and center a couple of children from marginalised identities in all of their marketing materials.
Tip 16: Close the Training Gaps for HR, SLT, Governors and Administrative Staff – creating a more inclusive approach to recruitment to diversify the staff, takes a lot of time and energy. This starts with identifying the training needs of all of the stakeholders potentially involved in recruitment. The DEIB training needs to be scheduled, in advance and form part of an ongoing commitment to upskilling all managers and leaders in HR matters to bring the people strategy to life. We know that we need Safer Recruitment training in place, wrap the DEIB and unconscious bias training around it.
Tip 17: Plan for Induction – finding and securing candidates is the start of the journey of onboarding new staff into your team to ensure they are included. As new staff are oriented into your ways of working, ensure that DEIB is a golden thread. Have a standardised DEIB session for line managers to deliver to all new staff at the start of each term, or get your DEIB lead to deliver it or pre-record it so everyone gets a consistent message.
Tip 18: Outline Development Opportunities – see the vacancy as an opportunity to showcase how you develop and nurture your staff. Find an opportunity at interview or in the interview documentation to share the talent management strategy and what CPD is on offer. This will inspire and motivate staff, and affirm that you invest in your staff including offering coaching and mentoring to empower them to have impact in their roles.
Tip 19: Focus on Retention as much as Recruitment – efforts are often focused on recruitment, but we also need to pay attention to staff retention. We need to regularly scrutinise and share our attrition data, identifying patterns and trends. If we are losing our mothers, how family-friendly is our school? If we are losing our neurodivergent staff, how neuro-inclusive are we? Exit interviews are too late to find out what is going on and what is going wrong, create feedback loops to listen and learn from staff surveys/ staff voice around levels of inclusion and belonging to make regular tweaks to the approach.
Tip 20: Give and Get Feedback from all of the Candidates – we hear from so many candidates who are not offered feedback following an interview, or who receive feedback that is not specific, constructive nor helpful for their development. Build into the process how feedback will be harvested and cascaded, see this as part of the value-add to all candidates but also as an opportunity to show your commitment to staff development. Also ask for feedback, be open to what worked and did not work to consider changes in future interview activities.
Our biggest advice is plan ahead and design for inclusion. These tips can all feed into a longer term piece of strategic work around your talent management process and people strategy. A strategic approach to inclusive recruitment and diversifying the workforce means we are focused on being proactive, preemptive and preventive instead of being reactive.
We have worked with some trusts where the training starts in May, the summer term is spent mapping milestones out with key stakeholders. The HR and recruitment team spend the summer period whilst schools are closed to review and update documentation. Then in the Autumn updates can be shared through meetings and training sessions for all stakeholders involved in recruitment. This means that our processes, policies, practices and people will be ready for the big push on recruitment from the Winter/ early Spring.
Our call to action is to be brave and to commit to doing things differently. This might include:
- Becoming more outward-facing as an organisation
- Creating a campaign about what it is like to work/ why you should consider working at the organisation
- Articulating your Employer’s Promise in multiple ways on your socials
- Growing the network around the organisation
- Holding recruitment days and open events for the organisation
- Hosting events and training to create a buzz around the organisation
- Keeping a pipeline of talent warm and informed about opportunities
For more information check out the following support and resources:
- Our Inclusive Recruitment Toolkit
- Our Inclusive Recruitment Training
- Our session on Inclusive Recruitment at the ASCL national conference
- Our #DiverseEd Jobs Board in partnership with Teacheroo
If you are an organisation who has already committed to using our #DiverseEd Jobs Board throughout 2025, we will be in touch regarding a free webinar to support you all in your inclusive recruitment efforts.
An Educator’s Introduction to Culturally Responsive Teaching
Written by Eleanor Hecks
Eleanor Hecks is a writer who is passionate about helping businesses create inclusive and diverse spaces. She serves as the Editor in Chief of Designerly Magazine.
Today’s classrooms are more diverse than ever before. Students come from various backgrounds, whether cultural, linguistic or socioeconomic. They bring unique perspectives and experiences.
As the educator, your responsibility now extends beyond delivering the curriculum – it also involves fostering an inclusive environment where all your students feel valued, heard and empowered to achieve their true potential. Culturally responsive teaching is an essential solution.
What Is Culturally Responsive Teaching?
CTR is a research-based pedagogical approach that connects students’ cultural backgrounds with their learning. It focuses on recognizing the assets students can bring into the classroom instead of focusing on perceived shortcomings. CRT helps students engage in deeper learning and develop higher-level academic skills by making these connections.
Theories such as Lev Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and Jerome Bruner’s Scaffolding underpin CRT’s emphasis on building upon students’ knowledge. These approaches support the importance of connecting new learning to an existing schema, which is central to CRT.
Unlike teacher-centered traditional models, CRT emphasises the student. It integrates diverse cultural aspects into the instruction, tailoring the education process to the student’s needs. Since learning is meaningful and engaging, it promotes a sense of belonging, even among students belonging to minority or marginalized groups.
Why Is Culturally Responsive Teaching Necessary?
Implementing CRT is becoming increasingly necessary in today’s educational landscape. The traditional one-size-fits-all approach no longer addresses the realities of today’s classrooms. Here’s why CRT is growing in demand.
Addresses Diversity in Classrooms
Student ethnicity is growing. A 2022 summary released by the Department of Education showed that the student population comprises 6.5% Asian pupils, 6% mixed or black pupils and 2% belonging to other ethnic groups. These statistics reflect the growing diversity of classrooms in the UK. Standardised teaching methods fail to cater to this diversity, which leaves minority students disengaged and underrepresented.
Strengthens Student Engagement
Students are more likely to connect with and retain information when they see their identities reflected in the curriculum. CRT helps make learning more relevant to their lived experiences.
Promotes Equity and Inclusion
CRT seeks to reduce disparities in education by creating equitable learning environments that recognise and celebrate every student’s identity. Inclusive strategies benefit minority students and open opportunities for the majority to learn as the two groups participate in intercultural conversations and learn about each other’s cultures.
Prepares Students for a Globalised World
There is a direct, positive correlation between cultural and emotional intelligence. CRT equips students with the skills to understand and respect other people’s viewpoints.
Students who grasp that there are different cultures and beliefs grow into adults whose emotional intelligence (EI) makes them compassionate, open-minded and culturally sensitive. This emotional intelligence is responsible for between 27% and 45% of job success as a whole, emphasizing the importance of supporting students’ EI before they enter the workforce.
Develops Critical Thinking
Incorporating multicultural perspectives in classrooms challenges students to think critically about social issues, providing them additional context to understand the wide world around them.
How to Apply Culturally Responsive Teaching in Your Classroom
Adopting culturally responsive teaching doesn’t require completely overhauling your current working methods. Small, intentional changes can create significant impacts. Here are practical steps to integrate CRT into your teaching practices.
- Activate students’ knowledge by connecting with their cultural or personal experiences.
- Tie your lessons to real-world events or contemporary issues so students see their value beyond the classroom.
- Ensure your curriculum and resources reflect diverse authors and cultures.
- Consider your classroom’s physical and visual setup to be more inclusive of minority groups.
- Build strong student-teacher relationships and learn more about your students’ interests, cultural backgrounds and identities.
- Create opportunities for group projects and assignments.
- Attend workshops, read research and collaborate with colleagues to refine your pedagogic practices.
The Impact of Culturally Responsive Teaching
Culturally responsive teaching can transform both students and teachers. For your pupils, it strengthens their sense of identity, boosts academic achievement and allows for deeper engagement with their learning experience. For educators, it provides an opportunity to make a meaningful impact in their students’ lives as they contribute to a more equitable education system. Embracing CRT enables students to prepare for the multicultural world beyond their classrooms.
Empowerment, Inclusion, and Storytelling: A New Approach to History Education
Written by Dana Saxon
Dana Saxon is an educator, writer, and family historian who seeks to address global inequities in education. Her organisation, Ancestors unKnown, changes the way pupils learn about history, themselves, and the world around them, providing opportunities for them to learn about marginalised histories and stories from their own communities.
Traditional history education can sometimes feel stale and uninspired – a series of dates and old white men who seem to have little or no relevance to the lives of today’s children. This approach, heavily focused on Eurocentric perspectives and the accomplishments of a select few, can leave many students feeling excluded and disconnected from the past.
But, as even Ofsted explained in their 2023 report about history education, “Every pupil is entitled to encounters with the richness of the past and the complexity of historical enquiry”.
A New Approach: Student Stories at the Centre
What if we reframed history education? What if we centred the learning experience around the unique stories of each child?
This is the vision driving Ancestors unKnown, a unique approach to history education that empowers young people by weaving their personal narratives into the larger context of local and global history.
At the heart of our methodology lies the belief that every child’s story is a valuable piece of the historical puzzle. We encourage students to explore their own family and community histories through oral histories and archival research. By interviewing elders, collecting family artefacts, and delving into local archives, children uncover the unique stories of their ancestors and the elders in their community, including their struggles, their triumphs, and their contributions to society.
Then, while our students are empowered to personalise historical research, we help them connect these personal narratives with the untold and often marginalised histories that have shaped our world. As a result, students learn about the contributions of diverse communities, stories about migration, struggles for social justice, and other hidden stories that lie beneath the surface of conventional historical narratives.
The Benefits of Ancestors unKnown
Our integrated approach fosters a profound sense of belonging and empowerment. When children see how their own stories connect to the larger historical narrative, they develop a deeper understanding of their place in the world. They begin to see themselves as active participants in history, not just passive observers.
Furthermore, by sharing their family histories with their classmates, children gain valuable insights into the diverse experiences and perspectives of those around them. This fosters empathy, understanding, and a greater appreciation for the people and communities around them.
With our approach, Ancestors unKnown is making history curriculum more inclusive and equitable. By centring the experiences of diverse communities and highlighting the contributions of marginalised groups, we challenge traditional narratives and create a more representative understanding of the past.
“Our community interviews were really successful!” shared a primary school teacher about their Year 5 Ancestors unKnown project.” We interviewed adults from South America, England, France, China and Nigeria! The children asked some really interesting questions and really enjoyed listening to the different family and community stories.”
Bringing Ancestors unKnown to More Classrooms
Ancestors unKnown provides schools with a toolkit and ongoing support to implement our programme during one school term for Y5 or Y6. We also offer teacher training, parent/community engagement workshops, and access to a network of local historians and storytellers as guest lecturers.
We believe that by empowering teachers, students, and their families with the tools and knowledge to uncover their own historical narratives, we can create a more inclusive and engaging learning experience for everyone.
Ready to transform history education in your school? Learn more about our programme and contact us to bring Ancestors unKnown into your classrooms.
Let’s work together to empower the next generation of historians to tell a different, more inclusive story about the past – a story that includes their ancestors.
From Representation to Transformation: The Impact of Diverse Governing Boards in Schools
Written by Krystian McInnis
Krystian McInnis is a Religious Education consultant, advisor, and researcher specialising in decolonising and diversifying Religious Education. With a career that spans the public, private, and charity sectors, he brings extensive national and international experience in curriculum diversification and decolonisation. As the Co-Founder of Reimagining Education, Krystian is dedicated to creating a more inclusive and equitable educational system where everyone feels seen, heard, and that they belong.
School governing boards in the UK are entrusted with the critical task of shaping the educational experiences of both students and staff. Within their role, they have the power to influence curriculum choices, define and redefine budget allocations and set the future direction of the school or trust, all whilst ensuring robust safeguarding policies are in place. Therefore, for these decisions to be equitable, inclusive, and representative of society, there must be a concerted e=ort to foster diversity within governing bodies that are then truly representative.
In a country as richly multi-cultural as the UK, ensuring that school governing boards reflect the communities they serve is notably more important now than ever before. Unfortunately however, as the UK’s demographics shifts, the diversity in school leadership remains stagnant. I believe that it is fundamental that we ensure governing boards mirror the demographics of their school communities. In doing so, this allows for them to be better equipped in making informed, equitable, and culturally competent decisions that benefit not only their students and staff, but the local community too. Sadly however, we see too often, where governing boards fail to reflect the diversity of their student bodies, they risk the potential for policies and practices to be occasionally overlooked and the inadequate addressing of key issues surrounding cultural sensitivity, religious practices and diverse student engagement and motivation.
Why Diversity on Governing Boards Matters
It’s important to note that the significance of diverse governing boards goes beyond fair representation and rather works towards a system where we can directly challenge biases and dismantle systemic inequities within education. When boards include individuals from varied cultural, racial and socioeconomic backgrounds, they bring with them a wealth of knowledge which not only benefit individual schools but also strengthens that of the local community too. Fundamentally, leadership diversity can seek to challenges traditional ideas of governance and in doing so encourage schools to adopt more inclusive and adaptable leadership styles. With diverse leadership teams often outperforming homogenous ones in terms of innovation, empathy and policy relevance, the time has come for us to move beyond the idea that leadership is monolithic and embrace the variety of voices available (George 2022).
Moreover, with diverse boards also more likely to foster a greater sense of cultural competency, having board members and trustees from different cultural backgrounds is beneficial and often results in a better understanding to address the unique needs of students from diverse backgrounds too. Carter (2021) found that within governing bodies, cultural awareness did not just enrich a board’s discussions, it in fact had tangible impacts on policy priorities, curriculum content, and school culture.
Although research is still in its infancy, emerging findings shows that there is also a link between diverse governing boards and student success. Begum (2020) asserts that a governing board that mirrors its student body helps to creates an environment where every child feels they belong, ultimately resulting in an increase to their motivation and engagement to learning. This level of representation becomes of even more importance at the governance level, not just for students, but for sta= and the local community too. With one of the roles of school governance to have a positive impact for both the school and local community too, strengthening relationships between schools and the wider community, where parents and community members see themselves reflected on the governing board, helps to build trust and foster greater engagement with the school.
Reimagining School Leadership: Moving Beyond Outdated Governance Models
Diversity within school governing boards also has broader implications for the diversity of sta= within the school. A diverse governing body helps to set the tone for inclusive hiring practices, which in turn ensures a more diverse teaching and support sta= workforce. For decades, UK school governance has been based on an antiquated, old fashioned model of leadership, concentrated in the hands of a small group of individuals, often lacking in diversity. The time has come however, for this to be truly reimagined. Leadership teams need to be able to address the challenges faced by their modern, multicultural student and sta= populations, not just from a theoretical standpoint but through having similar lived experiences too. Therefore, reimagining what leadership looks like means moving away from the ‘we have always done it this way’ approach, to creating space for innovative and culturally competent governance. It is vital therefore, for diverse governing bodies to support in this work, to take up the mantle and challenge the traditional hierarchies of leadership that have often overlooked the contributions of minority groups. By creating space for a broader range of voices, schools will undoubtedly develop a more flexible and inclusive leadership structure.
Building a Diverse Governing Board: Recruitment and Support
Whilst the recruiting of diverse members to school governing boards is an essential step, it is by no means enough on its own. Once diverse board members are recruited, schools must ensure they have in place adequate support and training necessary to be effective contributors. One of the major issues I have found, is that within many schools and trusts, once diverse members are recruited, the assumption is that the work is complete. Arguably however, the work has merely only begun. Training and support is fundamental, as is the revisiting of preexisting induction processes, which are often insufficient in preparing new governors to tackle the complexities of a multicultural, multifaceted education system. Schools need to rethink their induction programs to include tailored training on cultural competency, anti-racism, and inclusive leadership at the very least to genuinely support their staff, students and newly appointed governors too.
Schools and academy trusts however, do not need to do this work in isolation. Building collaborative networks is a key benefit of diverse boards, as is creating a more equitable educational system too. By connecting with a broad range of community organisations and support systems, schools can access additional resources, partnerships, and opportunities that enrich students’ educational experiences, ones which may not have been open to them before. Within this, these connections not only strengthen the school’s ties to the community but also provide a network of support for families, and staff members too.
To increase diversity within school leadership, intentional steps must be taken. Whilst many schools are in their embryonic phase of capturing diversity metrics, very few know what to do with it, leaving it merely for senior leaders to interpret, or rather misinterpret. Therefore, schools must establish processes for tracking diversity metrics, including ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic background, and disability status, hold leaders accountable for the data, and allow for it to be an iterative process, understanding what is useful within their school context. Tracking diversity isn’t about collecting numbers for the sake of it—it’s about using that data to inform decisions, identify gaps, and ensure that all voices are being heard.
The Path to Inclusive Governance
Diversity on UK school governing boards is not merely a goal to be achieved but a foundational element of effective, representative, and inclusive governance. When students, parents, and community members see themselves reflected in leadership, they are more likely to engage. Ultimately, schools must become a hub where the wider community feels seen, heard, and that they belong. When actioned with genuine intention, this approach moves beyond being mere performative gestures, to one which brings about collaboration, community support, and academic success too. Whilst achieving diversity is good, sustaining this diversity requires dedication. Undoubtedly parts of the journey will be difficult, the rewards however, will be abundant.
A truly diverse governing body is not just a benefit for the school, but for society as a whole, shaping future generations of engaged, informed, and empowered leaders. So as we look to the future of school governance, I pose that we ask ourselves the following questions:
- How can we ensure that our school governing boards are truly representative of the diverse communities they serve, and not just in terms of numbers, but in the richness of experience and perspective?
- What steps can schools take to break down the barriers that currently prevent underrepresented groups from accessing leadership roles in governance?
- How can we move beyond the idea that diversity on governing boards is a ‘nice to-have’ and shift towards understanding it as an essential element for fostering student success and community engagement?
References
Begum, H. (2020). The Importance of Representation in School Leadership.
Carter, J. (2021). The Role of Cultural Competency in Educational Leadership.
George, R. (2022). Reforming Leadership: The Shift Towards Inclusive Governance.