Breaking Barriers: The Transformative Effect of Black Educators in Leadership

Krystian McInnis portrait

Written by Krystian McInnis

Krystian McInnis is a Religious Education consultant, advisor, and researcher specialising in decolonising and diversifying Religious Education. With a career that spans the public, private, and charity sectors, he brings extensive national and international experience in curriculum diversification and decolonisation. As the Co-Founder of Reimagining Education, Krystian is dedicated to creating a more inclusive and equitable educational system where everyone feels seen, heard, and that they belong.

One percent. This is the stark figure of Black Headteachers in England with a slight  increase to 1.3% for Deputy Headteachers, compared to 92.5% and 90.8% respectively  for White British equivalent (DfE, 2023). With many of the positions held by Black senior  leaders highly concentrated within inner London, the figures decline as we venture  further afield from the capital, with the northeast of England the worst affected, where whilst children of Black-African origin make up 1.3 per cent of the student population,  just 0.1 per cent of the region’s teachers identify in the same way (Gorard et al. 2023). 

The data is there for all to see, and whilst the conversation about change has been  ongoing for many years, with copious localised initiatives to address the issue, the  results appear the same, with little momentum or genuine centralised government  appetite for structural or transformative change. Whilst the implementation of short  

lived ‘successful’ localised responses to this historic problem has led some to herald  this as progress, worthy of celebration, I think it pertinent that we ask ourselves the  following questions: 

  • How much work, dedication and strategic planning did it take for us to reach this  mere one percent? 
  • What are the systemic barriers contributing to the underrepresentation of Black  Headteachers and Deputy Headteachers, and how can they be effectively  addressed? 
  • If achieving racial equity is a sincere aim that we are striving towards, why have  we become comfortable with tokenistic adulations, for results that quite frankly  fall below mediocre?  

Navigating the Leadership Ladder: Obstacles for Black Educators in Advancing 

The underrepresentation of Black educators in senior leadership roles is not due to a  lack of eNort or ambition among teachers. In fact, Black teachers have repeatedly  demonstrated a strong desire to attain leadership positions. Evidence shows that Black  teachers nationally are able to successfully navigate to middle leadership, but the cliN  that appears in front of them when stepping into senior leadership, is one that many fall  oN (NfER, 2020). It seems there is little room for their presence around senior leadership tables, with many only able to sit on the periphery in newly formed roles such as secondee, associate assistant head or under the guise of being part of an ‘extended’  leadership team. The illustrious title of Assistant Headteacher or Assistant Principal, as  the first step in senior leadership, appears for many, out of their reach. The actuality of  one step forward, two steps back is far too apparent. Good enough to take on additional  workload, but not good enough to be part of the substantive team.

Teacher Diversity and Its Impact on Student Experiences 

Underrepresentation of Black teachers has been disproportionately low for decades in  the UK and despite Black people making up 4.6% of the working age population, only  2.5% of teachers identify as Black (Glowach et al. 2023). The issues that arise however,  are plenty. Gorard (2018) found that one of the downsides to a lack of ethnic minority  teachers is the real possibility that this underrepresentation is not only having a  negative effect on educational processes but on student outcomes too.  

Beyond just students outcome however, what is interesting to note, is that ethnic  minority students with similarly ethnic minority teachers are often less likely to be seen  as disruptive (Dee, 2005), be referred for disciplinary reasons, be excluded (Grissom et  al., 2009, Lindsay and Hart, 2017), or suspended from school (Gordon et al. 2023,  Wright, 2015). With suspension rates at an all-time high (Busby, 2024), along with the  fact that Black children are up to six times more likely to be excluded from school than  their White peers (McIntyre et al. 2021), it appears clear that the recruiting of teachers  from racially diverse backgrounds, might in fact help with this current crisis we find  ourselves within. 

Furthermore, even more intriguing, is that students with teachers from similar ethnic  backgrounds to their own are also less likely to be classified as requiring special  education (Stiefel et al., 2022) and in fact, where ethnic minority students have teachers  of a similar ethnic minority to their own, they are more likely to be referred to a gifted  programme (Grissom and Redding, 2016, Grissom et al., 2017, Ofori, 2023, Egalite and  Kisida, 2016). Please note, this is not to suggest that students are being wrongly  diagnosed by professionals, but rather creates a space for questions to be further  explored. Historically however, the misdiagnosis of students from ethnic minority  backgrounds was certainly the case, specifically those of Caribbean ancestry. The seminal work by Bernard Coard, ‘How the West Indian Child is Made Educationally Subnormal in the British School System’, written in 1971, explored the educational  inequalities within the British educational system and found that West Indian students  were disproportionately represented and often wrongly enrolled in ‘educationally subnormal’ schools. 50 years on, it appears this legacy continues. 

Moving Beyond Tokenism: The Role of White Allies in Educational Reform 

Now, allow for there to be no confusion to the argument being made. An increase in  Black teachers and leaders is no silver bullet. It will not solve the abundance of issues  within the educational system nor is there a golden percentage to be achieved. What it  required, however, are meaningful steps in the right direction, the removal of barriers,  and for many more White leaders and allies to go beyond mere rhetoric and delve into  the world of action. 

Whilst reviewing recruitment policies are fundamental, these are often used as a delay  tactic to consciously, or subconsciously, buy time before genuine action is taken. With  continuous delays and excuses, the cultural masquerading in many schools is far too prevalent. One of BHM celebrations, the monotonous assembly being delivered year  after year on MLK Jr or Rosa Parks, where the only information changed is the date, or posters scarcely scattered about the school building pinned up, only to be pulled down on the Friday before the half term break, shoved back into a dark cupboard for another  year. This must change. Note, I am not suggesting that these celebrations should not  take place, but rather, they must be part of wider school initiatives instead of a plaster,  attempting to cover over a gushing wound. 

From Rhetoric to Reality: Creating Pathways from Middle to Senior Leadership 

Delay tactics must be abandoned. Whilst many schools move towards actively considering the diversity of their workforce and have a staffing body that reflects the  community they serve, much more work is required than to add a tokenistic phrase ‘we  encourage applications from diverse candidates’ within job advertisements or the belief  that by removing names from CVs all issues are solved in eliminating biases within  recruitment processes. Schools must step out of their comfort zones on how they have  always done things, a way which is no longer working (and arguably never has), and actively seek and develop talent. The time has come for leaders to go beyond providing  a mere TLR to the only ethnic member of staff in the school to oversee all things  diversity, as they are ‘the best fit’, and ensure it becomes part of the larger conversation  around the leadership table. 

For substantial and sustainable change to take place, leadership teams must  collaborate with teachers and external organisations who in many instances, with the  greatest of respect, are more knowledgeable than they are in areas such as this.  Peaking over the horizon however, help is on the way. Through forward thinking initiatives such as the Leaders Like Us programme and Aspiring Heads programme to  name a few, the current landscape supporting senior leaders from GMH backgrounds is  shifting. 

Therefore, as we move towards a brighter and more equitable future, I leave the  following questions for you to ponder: 

  • In what ways does your organisation address and dismantle barriers that may  hinder the advancement of minority ethnic teachers into leadership roles?
  • What partnerships or collaborations do you have in place to support the  leadership development of teachers from minority ethnic backgrounds?
  • How are you ensuring your organisation is not pushing diverse talent of the  middle leader to senior leadership cliff, but rather building a bridge for them to  cross?

References: 

Busby, E. (2024) Exclusions and suspensions hit record high as warning issued to all  schools, Independent, Available at:  

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/school-exclusions-suspensions figures-record-b2581943.html 

Dee, T. F. (2005) A Teacher Like Me: Does Race, Ethnicity, or Gender Matter? The  American Economic Review 95(2): 158–165. 

DfE (2023) School teacher workforce, Available at: https://www.ethnicity-facts figures.service.gov.uk/workforce-and-business/workforce-diversity/school-teacher workforce/latest/#full-page-history 

Demie, F., Kulwinder, M., Race, R. (2023) Ethnic inequality in the teaching workforce in  schools: Why it matters, BERA 

Egalite, A. J., Kisida, B. (2016) The Many Ways Teacher Diversity May Benefit Students,  Education Next 24(3)  

Glowach, T., Richards, M., Mitchell, R. (2023) More ethnic minority teachers are needed  in UK schools – but teaching can affect their mental health and wellbeing, School of  Education University of Bristol 

Gorard, S. (2018) Education Policy. Bristol: Policy Press 

Gorard, S., Chen, W., Tan, Y., Huat See, B., Gazmuri, C., Tereschchenko, A., Demie, F.,  Siddiqui, N. (2023) The disproportionality of ethnic minority teachers in England: trends,  patterns, and problems, Routledge Open Research, 13(2) 1-28. 

Grissom J., & Redding C. (2016) Discretion and Disproportionality: Explaining The  Underrepresentation of High-Achieving Students of Color In Gifted Programs, AERA.  

Grissom J., Nicholson-Crotty J., Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2009) Race, Region, and  Representative Bureaucracy Public Adm Review; 69: 911–919. 

Grissom J., Rodriguez L., Kern E. (2017) Teacher And Principal Diversity And The  Representation Of Students Of Color In Gifted Programs, The University of Chicago  Press, 117(3). 

Lindsay, C. A., & Hart, C. M. D. (2017) Exposure to same-race teachers and student  disciplinary outcomes for Black students in North Carolina, Educational Evaluation and  Policy Analysis, 39(3), 485–510. 

McIntyre, N., Parveen, N., Thomas, T. (2021) Exclusion rates five times higher for black  Caribbean pupils in parts of England, The Guardian, Available at:  

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/mar/24/exclusion-rates-black caribbean-pupils-england

NfER; Kettlewell, K., Lucas, M., McCrone, T., Liht, J., & Sims, D. (2020) School and trust  governance investigative report: October 2020, London: Department for Education 

Ofori, M. (2023) Lack of diversity in teaching in England means minority ethnic pupils  miss out, The Guardian, Available at:  

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/aug/29/lack-diversity-teaching-means minority-ethnic-pupils-england-miss-out 

Stiefel L., Syeda S., Cimpian J., O;Hagan, K. (2022) The Role of School Context in  Explaining Racial Disproportionality in Special Education, EdWorkingPaper: 22-661. 

White, N. (2024) No Black or Asian teachers in more than half of English primary  schools, report finds, Independent, Available at:  

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/no-black-asian-teachers-england primary-schools-b2544072.html 

Wright, A. (2015) Teachers’ perceptions of students’ disruptive behavior: The Effect of  Racial Congruence and Consequences for School Suspension, Association for  Education Finance and Policy Annual Conference.

by Hannah Wilson

Inclusive Recruitment: 20 Tips to Consider

Hannah Wilson portrait

Written by Hannah Wilson

Founder of Diverse Educators

‘Diversifying Recruitment’ and ‘Inclusive Recruitment’ are two terms that we often hear being mentioned frequently in education circles, but what is the difference in approach?

Diverse or diversifying suggests the focus is on finding diverse candidates. Inclusive or ‘inclusifying’ (phrase coined by Professor Paul Miller which we have adopted) suggests the focus is instead on including diverse candidates. A subtle and nuanced difference which makes the commitment more authentic and meaningful for all parties.

As fans of Simon Sinek’s ‘Golden Circle’ from his TED Talk: ‘Start With Why’, we would suggest that you start in your thinking and in your discussions as an educational employer, by using the model (Golden Circle = Why > How > What) to map out and align the purpose of recruiting differently. 

Example 1: 

  • Why do we want to diversify our staff body?
  • How diverse is our community and how does this compare to our various stakeholder groups?
  • What impact/ legacy are we striving for by diversifying our staff?

Example 2:  

  • Why do we want to make our recruitment process more inclusive?
  • How inclusive are our existing policies, processes and practices?
  • What is the impact of a more inclusive approach to our recruitment and to our workplace?

The clarity of understanding what we are trying to change and why we are trying to change it, is an important starting point in transforming how we do things. Moreover, becoming more conscious, confident and competent in identifying and removing/ reducing existing barriers facing candidates in the recruitment process is an ongoing training priority.

A shared understanding, a shared language and a shared approach will lead to a greater consistency in experience for all.

Some key language to consider and explore:

  • ‘Unconscious bias’ – have we discussed this in advance of starting a recruitment process and have key stakeholders had training?
  • ‘Glass ceiling’ – are we aware of where this sits above the women in education in the system and in our own organisation?
  • ‘Concrete ceiling’ – are we aware of where this sits about the people of colour in education in the system and in our own organisation?

Moreover, have we discussed, are we values-aligned and do we have a strategic approach when it comes to topics such as flexible working and the pay gap? 

We get asked a lot to support schools, colleges and trusts in their approach to recruitment, but the request is often too late in the process to make a real difference and to make changes meaningful. There are some quick wins you can make in the short term to create a more inclusive recruitment  process and experience, but really this needs to be a medium to long term project and we need to be planning for Summer 2025 and Autumn 2025 activities to get us better prepared for the Spring 2026 recruitment.  

Here are 20 tips to reflect on and discuss with colleagues: 

Tip 1: Review the JD & PS – particularly look at what  is down as being ‘desirable’ v ‘essential’ as some people will not apply if they do not meet all of the criteria. We are creating false barriers e.g. you must have the NASENCO or NPQH award to apply for this job is incorrect – they can be working towards it or start it once appointed.     

Tip 2: Review the Job Advert – screen the wording for bias and especially review any gendered language. Some language choices will suggest only a certain type of candidate should apply e.g. for headship a leader ‘with gravitas’ might lead to more male candidates applying.

Tip 3: Articulate your DEIB Commitment – consider where in the initial documentation would a candidate know that you are on a DEIB journey and truly committed to change as an organisation.  Do you have a DEIB statement that can be lifted and included? A policy and/ or a DEIB action plan that can be hyperlinked? 

Tip 4: Share your Commitment to Flexible Working – research shows us that by mentioning an openness to flexible working you get an increase in applicants. Since the Flexible Working Bill was passed the system has had to consider flexible working as a recruitment tool as well as a retention tool. Make it explicit from the beginning of the process what might be possible so candidates do not waste your time and you do not waste their time either!

Tip 5: Consider where to Advertise – if we keep doing the same we will keep getting the same. Some Jobs Boards are very expensive and draw a certain audience. Diversifying where you are advertising can also lead to you finding more diverse candidates. E.g. for governance you can post adverts in special interest Linkedin groups and networks such as Black Governors Network.

Tip 6: Consider who is Sharing the Advert and where / to who – recruitment needs to  become a team sport and not just the work of HR. If your staff are outward facing and are on socials, ask them to share opportunities with their networks. Push it beyond the immediate network around the organisation to find people beyond that. 

Tip 7: Review the Application Form – you might already be doing all of the above and wondering why it is not working, but have you looked at the fields the candidate has to complete at application level and the information they have to read as often forms are out of date and undermine the DEIB work that is happening e.g. asking a question like What is your gender? With binary answers like M/F. How would someone trans or non-binary complete this question? How might this put off trans allies from applying too?

Tip 8: Review your ‘Shop Window’ – your organisation’s website and your social media accounts also need reviewing and updating so everything is harmonised. If you are saying in the call to action you are interested in hearing from diverse candidates who reflect the diversity of the local community, but your website imagery does not reflect this it creates dissonance. If the person running the social media accounts has not been briefed and is only amplifying white, male thought leaders and people who share exclusionary content online, this will contradict the DEIB commitment you have articulated and this will lead to further self deselection.

Tip 9: Create a ‘Blank’ Selection Process – lots of organisations pride themselves on running ‘blind’ recruitment processes. Consider how ableist this language is and how it might undermine your commitment to DEIB. Is there another way of sharing what you are doing to try to remove bias in the process from blanking out names, race, age, salaries and institutions candidates have worked/ studied at?

Tip 10: Diversify who is Involved in the Long and Short Listing Process – bias creeps in as soon as applicants start arriving. Different people reviewing and handling the applications will have their own biases around spelling, punctuation and grammar, around font choice and formatting, around language choices before you even start digging into the details. Consider who is involved in creating and applying the selection criteria and how you score the application.  

Tip 11: Articulate in the Invitation to Interview what Support is Available – instead of waiting for diversity to wave at you and say ‘hey, I am different and need this from you…’ consider leading with what you can offer as adjustments and support, and share this with all candidates. E.g. On the day you will have access to allocated parking, a lift, a quiet room, a prayer room… we serve Halal food in our school kitchen. People will feel more comfortable confirming what they need to thrive at the interview, but this will also show all candidates that you are fully committed to inclusion.    

Tip 12: Send out Interview Questions out in Advance – many institutions are now sending questions out in advance to support neurodivergent applicants with processing time. But this approach also benefits other candidates including those who are less confident, introverted or who have had some time out of the system. Everyone will perform better! There are concerns that people will cheat and use ChatGTP to craft responses but we will be able to identify a contrived response and interrogate further.   

Tip 13: Create an Accessible and Inclusive Interview Experience – ensure the interview format, tasks and briefing documents are accessible for all candidates, thus removing any barriers. Build in a task or a question to check for values alignment to your organisational commitment to DEIB. Values tasks can be scenario-based but can also be sent out in advance to reflect on and prepare as a pre-task to share at the interview.

Tip 14: Consider all of the Candidate Touchstones – curate the range of people that the candidates will interact with at each point of the process from ringing up to book a visit, coming for a pre-interview tour, to the day itself and communications from the HR lead before, during and after. Where are the opportunities for candidates to see themselves and other diverse identities in the process?

Tip 15: Be Authentic and Honest, Avoid Being Performative – we get regular feedback from candidates that they appreciate transparency from prospective employers. If an organisation can identify and articulate their gaps/ shortcomings this acknowledges that they are aware of their gaps and they want to do better in representing the diversity of their community in the diversity of the staff body. We are also aware that some organisations use stock images of diverse staff and center a couple of children from marginalised identities in all of their marketing materials.    

Tip 16: Close the Training Gaps for HR, SLT, Governors and Administrative Staff –  creating a more inclusive approach to recruitment to diversify the staff, takes a lot of time and energy. This starts with identifying the training needs of all of the stakeholders potentially involved in recruitment. The DEIB training needs to be scheduled, in advance and form part of an ongoing commitment to upskilling all managers and leaders in HR matters to bring the people strategy to life. We know that we need Safer Recruitment training in place, wrap the DEIB and unconscious bias training around it.        

Tip 17: Plan for Induction – finding and securing candidates is the start of the journey of onboarding new staff into your team to ensure they are included. As new staff are oriented into your ways of working, ensure that DEIB is a golden thread. Have a standardised DEIB session for line managers to deliver to all new staff at the start of each term, or get your DEIB lead to deliver it or pre-record it so everyone gets a consistent message. 

Tip 18: Outline Development Opportunities – see the vacancy as an opportunity to showcase  how you develop and nurture your staff. Find an opportunity at interview or in the interview documentation to share the talent management strategy and what CPD is on offer. This will inspire and motivate staff, and affirm that you invest in your staff including offering coaching and mentoring to empower them to have impact in their roles.  

Tip 19: Focus on Retention as much as Recruitment – efforts are often focused on recruitment, but we also need to pay attention to staff retention. We need to regularly scrutinise and share our attrition data, identifying patterns and trends. If we are losing our mothers, how family-friendly is our school? If we are losing our neurodivergent staff, how neuro-inclusive are we? Exit interviews are too late to find out what is going on and what is going wrong, create feedback loops to listen and learn from staff surveys/ staff voice around levels of inclusion and belonging to make regular tweaks to the approach.    

Tip 20: Give and Get Feedback from all of the Candidates – we hear from so many candidates who are not offered feedback following an interview, or who receive feedback that is not specific, constructive nor helpful for their development. Build into the process how feedback will be harvested and cascaded, see this as part of the value-add to all candidates but also as an opportunity to show your commitment to staff development. Also ask for feedback, be open to what worked and did not work to consider changes in future interview activities.  

Our biggest advice is plan ahead and design for inclusion. These tips can all feed into a longer term piece of strategic work around your talent management process and people strategy. A strategic approach to inclusive recruitment and diversifying the workforce means we are focused on being proactive, preemptive and preventive instead of being reactive. 

We have worked with some trusts where the training starts in May, the summer term is spent mapping milestones out with key stakeholders. The HR and recruitment team spend the summer period whilst schools are closed to review and update documentation. Then in the Autumn updates can be shared through meetings and training sessions for all stakeholders involved in recruitment. This means that our processes, policies, practices and people will be ready for the big push on recruitment from the Winter/ early Spring. 

Our call to action is to be brave and to commit to doing things differently. This might include:

  • Becoming more outward-facing as an organisation
  • Creating a campaign about what it is like to work/ why you should consider working at the organisation
  • Articulating your Employer’s Promise in multiple ways on your socials
  • Growing the network around the organisation
  • Holding recruitment days and open events for the organisation
  • Hosting events and training to create a buzz around the organisation
  • Keeping a pipeline of talent warm and informed about opportunities

For more information check out the following support and resources:

If you are an organisation who has already committed to using our #DiverseEd Jobs Board throughout 2025, we will be in touch regarding a free webinar to support you all in your inclusive recruitment efforts.

by Hannah Wilson

Empowering pupils to challenge gender stereotypes: A Premier League Primary Stars initiative

PLPS portrait

Written by PLPS

Premier League Primary Stars helps children to learn through the power of football in more than 19,000 primary schools across England and Wales. Free Premier League Primary Stars resources can be downloaded from www.plprimarystars.com

Gender stereotypes remain a persistent barrier to achieving equity in education and society. They influence how young people perceive themselves and others, shaping aspirations, limiting opportunities, and perpetuating inequality. This is why initiatives that actively address these biases are vital. One such initiative is the new resource from Premier League Primary Stars, designed to help teachers tackle gender stereotyping in schools while fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion.

The importance of challenging gender stereotypes

Gender stereotypes are deeply rooted assumptions about what boys and girls can or should do, often perpetuated by cultural norms, media, and historical biases. For instance, boys might be discouraged from pursuing artistic hobbies, while girls may face discouragement in sports or STEM subjects. Left unchecked, these stereotypes not only limit individual potential but also contribute to systemic inequality, reinforcing societal structures that marginalise certain groups.

By addressing these biases early, teachers can empower pupils to critically evaluate and challenge such assumptions. Doing so creates a foundation for more inclusive attitudes, enabling children to celebrate diversity and develop empathy.

A free resource that makes a difference

Premier League Primary Stars’ new gender stereotyping lesson is a comprehensive, teacher-friendly tool that equips teachers to lead impactful discussions and activities. Designed for Key Stage 2 pupils in England and Progression Steps 2 and 3 in Wales, the resource is both practical and inspiring.

Key features of the resource

  1. Empowering activities:
    The lesson introduces pupils to the concept of gender stereotypes and helps them identify biases they may encounter in school or the wider world. Through engaging activities and thought-provoking discussions, pupils gain the confidence to challenge these stereotypes constructively.
  2. Inspiring role models:
    Representation matters. The lesson highlights stories of individuals – both male and female – who have defied traditional gender roles, encouraging pupils to think critically and celebrate diversity. From female athletes excelling in male-dominated sports to male caregivers embracing nurturing roles, these examples inspire young minds to imagine a world free of limitations.
  3. Youth voice film:
    The inclusion of a dynamic film amplifies the voices of young people, providing relatable insights and practical advice on fostering inclusion. This multimedia approach helps make the resource accessible and engaging, sparking meaningful conversations in the classroom.
  4. Expertly crafted for teachers:
    Developed in collaboration with subject matter experts and practising teachers, the resource is user-friendly and aligned with the curriculum. This ensures that teachers are well-supported in delivering sensitive and impactful lessons.

Real-world impact in schools

Feedback from teachers who have used the resource has been overwhelmingly positive. One PSHE primary teacher in Wales noted:

“This is a very user-friendly and engaging lesson that effectively targets the idea of stereotyping in school and out of school.”

The practical design of the lesson not only saves teachers time but also builds their confidence in addressing a complex topic. For pupils, the benefits are profound. They develop critical thinking skills, inclusive attitudes, and the ability to challenge harmful stereotypes – skills that will serve them well throughout their lives.

A call to action for teachers

Teachers have a unique opportunity to shape the next generation’s understanding of equity and inclusion. Tackling gender stereotypes in the classroom is a crucial step toward this goal. The Premier League Primary Stars resource provides a roadmap for doing just that, empowering both teachers and pupils to contribute to a more inclusive society.

Premier League encourages teachers across the UK to explore this free resource and integrate it into their PSHE or Health and Well-being lessons. By fostering open discussions and providing pupils with tools to challenge stereotypes, we can help dismantle barriers and create a world where all children can thrive – regardless of their gender.

For more information and to access the resource, visit Premier League Primary Stars.

Together, let’s champion diversity, equity, and inclusion in every classroom.

by Hannah Wilson

Addressing the impact of global conflicts

Claire Shooter and Monia Zahid portrait

Written by Claire Shooter and Monia Zahid

Claire is Deputy Head Pastoral and DSL with a keen interest in EDI. She changed career and went into teaching 16 years ago after her children were born and has never regretted it. Over this time, she has enjoyed a range of roles including Head of Spanish and Head of Year.

Monia is Head of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion and teacher of Economics at Haberdashers’ Boys’ School. She oversees EDI provision at the school and is passionate in driving change for the whole school community.

If you are to take just one message from this blog, then let it be that schools must always be safe spaces for students, especially in times of global unrest. Over the past year, our school has learned invaluable lessons about how global conflicts can ripple into a school community, affecting students in profound ways.

Our school, located just outside North West London, has a vibrant and diverse community, with active faith and cultural societies, a multi-faith prayer room, and celebrations of key festivals from many religious traditions, including Eid and Chanukah. We would say that our diversity is our ‘superpower’ and our students have ample opportunities to learn about each other’s faiths. 

So the immediate weeks following October 7th 2023 threw an unprecedented and emotional challenge.

At our initial assembly following the horrific events of that day, we took a moment to reflect on the events unfolding in Israel and Gaza, honoured the casualties, and reminded students not to engage in divisive political discourse that could lead to conflict or tension within the school.

However, many of our Jewish students felt frustrated and unsupported, feeling that we were minimising their pain by not acknowledging the attack for what it was—a terrorist act. They felt that if such violence had occurred in any other part of the world, it would have been called out more forcefully. Many of our Muslim students expressed their fears about being targeted due to their Muslim identity. They voiced frustration that the suffering of innocent Palestinians was not being acknowledged, while stereotypes and misinformation about Muslims went unchallenged.  

Both Muslim and Jewish students were living in fear, be it Zain who worried about his hijab-wearing sister, or Max who worried about wearing his Star of David chain. Both felt nervous to show their identities in public.

This marked the start of a week of difficult conversations as our student body articulately and respectfully voiced their concerns. We quickly found ways to offer support. One of the first initiatives was the student-led prayer service, a daily gathering attended by many students who wanted to reflect, pray, or simply share a sense of community. 

At the end of that week our Headmaster addressed the entire school in a special assembly. He acknowledged the emotional toll on our community, quoted students who had bravely shared their perspectives, and provided historical context for the conflict. He reframed our message of unity and respect, encouraging everyone to treat each other with kindness and grace. The assembly ended with a moving moment of reflection led by our Faith Assembly Committees.

Social media was another challenge to address. Algorithms often amplify one-sided views, and young people increasingly rely on platforms like Instagram and TikTok for their news, rather than traditional sources. These platforms often mix fact with fiction, viral conspiracy theories, and disturbing images. We provided clear guidelines on how to navigate social media responsibly, reminding students to think critically before liking or sharing content and to be mindful of the digital footprint they leave behind. When inappropriate posts appeared, we used a combination of education and sanction to address issues.

We also realised that staff members needed support, unsure of how to engage in conversations for fear of being seen as political. Many felt isolated, and simply taking the time to approach another colleague and acknowledge the difficulty of the situation went a long way toward breaking down those feelings. By fostering an environment where everyone, regardless of their political views, could talk openly and with empathy, we began to rebuild a sense of community. It’s not about politics, it’s about humanity.

While we acknowledge that there is still much work and education to be done, we are committed to trying to guide our students through the complexities of the world around them. Our students have voiced appreciation for the fact that tensions are left outside the school gates, and it’s a safe place for all. Whilst we don’t have all the answers, we’re committed to ensuring that:

– Anti-racism efforts also incorporate discussions on both antisemitism and Islamophobia, so that all students, regardless of their background, can become allies in challenging hate.

– We ask the difficult questions and acknowledge the emotional weight of these issues—not to take a political stance, but to show empathy and understanding. 

– We create opportunities for students to learn from diverse views, helping them understand that dialogue is not about winning arguments but about hearing other perspectives and learning to ‘disagree agreeably’.

– We recognise that this work is ongoing, and schools need to create spaces for continued dialogue, assemblies, and reflection.

– Above all, we strive to create a safe and supportive space for *all* students, where diversity is celebrated, and the narratives students encounter promote unity, respect, and mutual understanding.

by Hannah Wilson

Don’t Assume…

Gerlinde Achenbach portrait

Written by Gerlinde Achenbach

Gerlinde Achenbach is a senior education consultant and former primary headteacher. Her career spans more than 35 years, with over 30 years teaching in schools. Since 2021 she has been supporting schools across the UK with Equity, Diversity & Inclusion, specifically LGBTQ+ inclusion. Her expertise is in leadership and changing school culture.

It is a reality that every LGBTQ+ stakeholder within a school community – child or young person, member of staff, visitor, parent or carer – is on the receiving end of constant heteronormative messaging. This isn’t because schools are not complying with their Public Sector Equality Duty or because they’re not focused on being inclusive. It’s because the world is set up to portray ‘usual’ as heterosexual. 

The Oxford languages dictionary defines heteronormativity as: “denoting or relating to a world view that promotes heterosexuality as the normal or preferred sexual orientation.” 

Heteronormativity permeates every aspect of school life. It’s in the images on our walls, it’s in the things we say and in what we do. Put simply, there’s an unspoken acceptance that it is ‘the norm’. It confirms for us that heterosexual relationships dominate the human experience. It also reminds us of the relationship between heterosexuality and gender inequity for women and girls through history. We see this every day, where gendered language, stereotyping and imbalanced expectations still dominate our lived experience in the wider world. We like to think we work hard to challenge this in our schools…but are we doing enough?

What can heteronormativity look like in schools?

Environments

  • Most images of families show mums and dads. This can be on ‘welcome’ posters or in books and images on display. 
  • We find ‘corporate’ cartoon images depicting (stereotypical) boy, girl, boy, girl across school spaces. 
  • Books and literature have not been evaluated in terms of how representative they are of different types of families or identities.

Systems and Policies

  • In primary schools we have a habit of assuming (unless told otherwise) that a child has heterosexual parent(s) and that our children will end up in heterosexual relationships.
  • We include ‘mother / father’ on application forms and permission slips.
  • The words ‘Mr & Mrs’ are on the tips of our tongues when referring to families. 
  • Our school uniform policies state gendered expectations for girls and boys, even down to shoe styles. 
  • Our staff dress code does the same. 
  • We appoint a Head Girl and a Head Boy.
  • Our website staff lists denote marital status first – Mrs, Miss, Mr – and we have the same on classroom doors.

Communication and Language

  • We welcome our children with “Good morning, boys and girls” and our staff, or parents and carers, with “ladies and gentlemen”. 
  • The phrase, “Tell / give this to / show / ask your mum and dad” rolls off the tongue  for most school staff. 
  • Staff address girls as ‘darling’, ‘princess’, ‘sweetie’, and boys as ‘mate’, ‘mister’, ‘dude’. 
  • We hear the terms ‘Headmaster’ and ‘Headmistress’. We address staff as ‘Sir’ and ‘Miss’.
  • We hear adults calling for ‘a couple of strong boys’ for certain tasks around school.

Practice and Culture

  • We line up our classes in boys’ and girls’ lines, or in a boy, girl formation. 
  • We seat them on their carpet ladybird places or at tables in the same way. 
  • We separate and organise children by gender for the most random of reasons and activities.
  • We organise role play, construction and crafts with different genders in mind, albeit subconsciously.
  • We appoint class names of famous scientists, authors, sports people or musicians where the majority are male (and straight).
  • The staff culture feels fixed, exclusive, cliquey and difficult to break into.
  • Staff congratulate themselves on the way they have always done things. 

I have deliberately not set out here inclusive versions of the above examples. They are a starting point for whole staff thinking and they’re guaranteed to promote worthwhile discussion. It’s important in our schools to do the hard work required, challenge heteronormativity in all its guises and ask the following questions:

  • Might a child with same-sex parents feel quietly excluded in our school?  
  • Will their parents feel welcome?
  • How about a child who has lost a parent, or a child who is care-experienced? 
  • Have we removed assumptions in all our interactions with families?
  • Can a member of staff, whatever their sexual orientation or identity, can be their authentic self at work?
  • Are our language and expectations truly gender-inclusive?
  • Is our inclusive approach understood by all groups of staff in their varying roles across school?

Why does this matter? It matters because of the need for us all to feel we belong in the places where we, or our loved ones, spend a good deal of time. Marian Wright Edelman coined the phrase, ‘You can’t be what you can’t see’, and this matters if you rarely see yourself (child or adult) or your family represented in your school. Representation is validation.

It matters because subliminal messages such as those received (through unthinking words, gendered phrases and activities defined by gender) by girls and women, or by those for whom gender is not fixed or for whom gender causes anguish, can be damaging and self-fulfilling over time.

by Hannah Wilson

Does AI promote Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion?

Caroline Anukem portrait

Written by Caroline Anukem

Caroline Anukem is Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Lead at Beaconsfield High School in the UK. She is a driving force, a change-maker, and a relentless advocate for equity.

As the new term is upon us, it is essential to delve into a topic that has been sparking conversations and debates across various sectors; artificial intelligence (AI). With its rapid advancements and widespread use AI has become both a revolutionary tool and a subject of scrutiny. In this piece I will particularly focus on its potential impact on equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI).

The Rise of Artificial Intelligence: Can be defined as a “Double-Edged Sword”

In recent years, AI has emerged as a powerful tool that promises to revolutionise industries and transform the way we work and live. From predictive analytics to natural language processing, AI technologies offer unprecedented capabilities to automate tasks, analyse vast amounts of data, and even simulate human-like behaviours. As a result, AI has found applications in diverse fields, from healthcare and finance to marketing and entertainment.

However, in parallel with the transformative potential, AI also raises significant ethical and social concerns. One of the most pressing issues is the perpetuation of biases and inequalities within AI systems. Despite the promise to be objective and impartial, AI algorithms often reflect and amplify the biases present in the data they are trained on. It is important to recognise that artificial intelligence does not account for representation and definitely has its own biases. It is fair to say that most artificial intelligence programmes draw its answers from existing information on the internet which we all know is heavily skewed towards a white, male, privileged voice. What this means is that there are ultimately gaps in how ‘diverse’ or ‘inclusive’, or well-balanced, its conclusions are. The results will ultimately produce discriminatory outcomes, reinforcing existing inequalities and marginalising already underrepresented groups.

The Biases Embedded in AI Systems

The biases embedded in AI systems are evident on several layers and thus pervasive, reflecting the biases inherent in society at large. For example, AI algorithms trained on biased datasets may exhibit racial, gender, or socioeconomic biases, leading to discriminatory outcomes in areas such as hiring, lending, and criminal justice. Similarly, AI-powered recommendation systems may reinforce stereotypes and narrow perspectives by promoting content that aligns with dominant narratives and preferences.

Moreover, the lack of diversity in the development and deployment of AI technologies exacerbates these biases. The underrepresentation of women, people of colour, and other marginalised groups in the tech industry means that AI systems are often designed and implemented without sufficient consideration for diverse perspectives and experiences. As a result, AI technologies may inadvertently exclude or disadvantage certain groups, serving to further perpetuate inequalities and hampering progress towards equity and inclusion.

The Importance of Addressing Bias in AI

Addressing bias in AI is not only a matter of fairness and social justice but also essential for ensuring the effectiveness and reliability of AI systems. Biased AI algorithms can lead to inaccurate predictions, unjust outcomes, and diminished trust in AI technologies, undermining their potential to drive positive change and innovation.

Moreover, the consequences of biased AI extend beyond individual experiences to societal structures and norms. By disseminating stereotypes and reinforcing inequalities, biased AI systems contribute to systemic injustices and sabotage efforts to create a more equitable and inclusive society.

Strategies for Promoting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in AI

To mitigate bias in AI and promote equity, diversity, and inclusion, rigorous intentional efforts are needed at every stage of the AI lifecycle, from data collection and algorithm design to deployment and evaluation. 

Some strategies for facilitating and embedding EDI in AI:

Diversifying Datasets: It is essential to ensure that AI training datasets are diverse, representative, inclusive and reflecting a wide range of voices and experiences is essential for reducing bias in AI systems.

Increasing transparency and accountability in AI algorithms can help identify and address biases and ensure that AI systems are fair and equitable. Integrating ethical considerations into AI development processes, such as fairness, accountability, transparency, and privacy (FATP), can help mitigate bias and promote responsible AI innovation.

Inclusive Development Teams: Promoting diversity and inclusion within AI development teams will bring about diverse perspectives to the table and help identify and address biases in AI systems.

Community Engagement: Engaging with stakeholders and communities affected by AI technologies will help ensure that AI systems reflect their needs, values, and aspirations.

Continuous Evaluation and Improvement: Regularly evaluating AI systems for bias and fairness and implementing corrective measures as needed is crucial for promoting equity and inclusion in AI.

As a baseline, implementing some of these strategies and encouraging collaborations across disciplines and sectors, will work towards creating AI technologies that are truly equitable, diverse, and inclusive, and yoke the transformative potential of AI to build a better future for all.

In Conclusion

As we work through the complex intersection of AI and EDI, we cannot downplay the profound implications of biased AI systems and the importance of promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion in AI development and deployment.  During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of algorithms to determine grades is another example of the pervasive impact of bias in education assessment. By addressing bias in AI and committing to a culture of inclusivity and accountability, it will be possible to harness the full potential of AI to drive positive social change and build a more just and equitable world for generations to come.

What are your thoughts on the intersection of AI and EDI? Share your insights and experiences with. Let’s continue the conversation and work towards a future where AI truly reflects and serves the diversity of human experiences.

by Hannah Wilson

Should schools provide prayer spaces?

Zahara Chowdhury portrait

Written by Zahara Chowdhury

Zahara is founder and editor of the blog and podcast, School Should Be, a platform that explores a range of topics helping students, teachers and parents on how to ‘adult well’, together. She is a DEI lead across 2 secondary schools and advises schools on how to create positive and progressive cultures for staff and students. Zahara is a previous Head of English, Associate Senior Leader and Education and Wellbeing Consultant.

The recent High Court decision, ruling in favour of headteacher Birbalsingh’s decision to ban prayer spaces has created quite the media storm. The decision has raised concerns about the precedent it sets for schools creating safe spaces for students and staff, Muslim students and staff in particular. It has also raised conversations about what schools are for and how schools and workplaces can fulfill their obligation to adhere to the Equality Act and The Public Sector Equality Duty – and how they can get around it too.

The responses to the verdict reveal that we live in a society and online world in which Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hate is increasing; whilst we have ‘come a long way’ in overcoming Islamophobia since 9/11, a high court ruling like this makes me wonder if we’ve made any difference at all to the safety of Muslims for future generations? The verdict also reveals the disconnect that exists within the school system itself: we have some leaders who are not interested in creating unity and understanding within a diverse country – yet at the same time they ‘tokenistically’ take pride in multiculturalism too. And, we have other leaders in education giving us hope, embedding inclusive and equitable practices in everyday school life. I find it baffling that a simple question about prayer spaces ends up at the gates of a High Court. To me, this not only reveals a lack of unity and understanding in a school but also an absence of a critical skill that should be at the centre of schooling: listening.

Many educators and commentators have been sharing their concerns and outrage about the decision. It will also concern parents and students who regularly use prayer spaces in schools, maybe even at work (many teachers use prayer spaces too). It’s a disappointing decision and whilst several anti-woke keyboard warriors rejoice at the ruling, we cannot let it set a precedent for schools – and I don’t think it will. Schools absolutely should provide prayer spaces and they will continue to provide such safe spaces for students – it’s quite simply common sense. For this blog, examples and explanations are practical and experiential, based on what life is like ‘in school’. Whilst research and data are important, progress, collaboration and community cohesion are also nurtured by listening to the candid, lived experiences of staff and students in schools.

Time and space to pray

In line with the Equality Act, allowing students and staff to pray is reasonable and proportionate to a school and working day. It is comparable to allowing students to have break times, music lessons and god-forbid, toilet breaks. Different forms of prayer and spiritual practice are a part of nearly every faith. In Islam, praying 5 times a day is an integral part of the faith. It takes 5-10 minutes to pray. For the duration of that time, a prayer mat takes up just as much space as a two-seater desk. Depending on the time of year, prayer usually fits into a lunchtime. Just as schools host extracurricular clubs, music lessons sports fixtures and more, prayer can usually fit into this time too. It is not a big ask and it is not disruptive.

Some schools may have a designated prayer room, which is great. Other schools may allocate a classroom, usually near a space where a teacher is ‘on duty’ anyway; the last time I checked, prayer doesn’t require back flips, cartwheels or balancing on one’s head…the health and safety risks are fairly manageable. Some schools might even say, ‘if you need to pray and you have what you need with you (prayer mat, head covering, beads, holy book etc…), feel free to use a designated safe space. It does not need to be complicated.

Prayer spaces are not the problem

To blame prayer and collective worship for peer pressure and bullying is deflecting from the real problem. If children start praying as a result of seeing others pray, or if they simply observe with questions and curiosity, why is this such a problem? If they find it to be a positive experience, surely that can only be a positive learning experience. If the opposite happens, it’s not necessarily a problem either. Rather, it’s a teachable moment and reveals hostile attitudes any school should be aware of. Knowledge about the prejudices within our communities is the first step to safeguarding young people in education. ‘Cancelling’ or banning prayer spaces is not. 

‘Banning’ or ‘cancelling’ (on and offline) doesn’t work. It is a power-based behaviour management tool fuelling a notion that education is based on ‘controlling the masses’. We all learn through conversation, discussion, listening, knowledge, understanding, boundaries and respect, not necessarily in that order. By no means are any of the latter ‘easy’ to achieve, but from working with teenagers I’ve found they’re open to a heated debate, discussion, learning, understanding and compromise. 

School is a place of work and I’m not sure why we expect teenagers to just abide by ‘yes and no’ rules with little to no explanation. Plus, if they find a reasonable solution (like praying in a classroom for 10 minutes at lunchtime), what’s the big deal? Secondary school students are a few years away from further education and the workplace, which we all know thrives on innovation, creativity and autonomy. In this case, a blanket prayer ban in a school (their current place of work) completely contradicts the 21st century workplace they will inhabit. It doesn’t make sense. 

‘It’s inconvenient: we don’t have time to police prayer spaces’

Like any theory of change, whether that be introducing a mobile phone policy or changes to a uniform policy, navigating any arising teething issues (by students, parents and the community), takes time and flexibility. None of this is impossible if it is built firmly into the school culture, relevant processes and policies. These policies and processes may be safeguarding, anti-bullying, behaviour management and curriculum. All of the above are part of a teacher’s and a school’s day-to-day functions; navigating prayer spaces is no different to introducing a new club or curriculum change. Plus, we somehow managed bubbles and one-way systems post-lockdown…I think schools are pretty well equipped to create a prayer space for all of a matter of minutes in a day!

Prayer is not ‘an add on’

Faith is observed differently, from person to person. It is a way of life, and an ongoing lived experience; for some it is an integral part of their identity and for others it is their identity. Prayer is a major part of several religious practices. Like some people are vegan and vegetarian, prayer is not just a choice and something to switch on and off – it is an intrinsic part of an individual’s life. Some individuals, as far as they possibly can, plan their days, weeks, holidays and more around prayer. Not only is it a religious obligation, it is also a source of wellbeing and peace. In a time where health and wellbeing are paramount in education, denying prayer spaces seems counterintuitive. Enabling some form of space (like we do options on a menu) for individuals to pray is a minimal request and something schools can do with minimal disruption. However, if cracks in the system are revealed and outrage spills online and at the High Court, there are bigger questions and concerns to address.

Schools don’t need to be ‘impossible’ or difficult spaces – and they shouldn’t be made out to be like this either. One high court ruling does not define the state of schooling in the UK. I have too much respect and experience (or maybe good fortune) of working in schools that enable, or at the very least, welcome conversations around inclusion, safety, flexibility and authenticity. None of the latter disrupts mainstream education and a student’s chances of attaining a grade 9. However, many other things do and those are inequitable opportunities, ‘belonging uncertainty’ (Cohen, 2022) and denying the identities of the young people we teach. 

by Hannah Wilson

'Coaches Like Us': You Have to See It To Be It

Hannah Wilson portrait

Written by Hannah Wilson

Founder of Diverse Educators

‘You have to see it to be it,’ the quote from Billy Jean King, is a phrase we hear used a lot to challenge the lack of visible role models in society but also in our profession.

It is widely agreed that diverse representation is needed in every layer of the school system. 

Our trust boards and governing bodies, our CEOs and Headteachers, our Senior Leader Teams are all people spaces that need diversifying. Alongside reviewing representation in our curriculum and in our libraries, for our learners, we also need to review it for our staff. (This is why we host a #DiverseEd World Book Day event each year to amplify authors from our network).  

There is a lot of continuing work to be done to disrupt, to dismantle, to diversify these different spaces and to review who gets to occupy them. 

But there are other educational spaces for us to also review:

  • Who recruits, develops and mentors our trainee teachers?
  • Who recruits, develops and mentors our early career teachers?
  • Who recruits, develops and mentors our aspiring leaders?
  • Who recruits, develops and coaches our existing leaders?

When you review these spaces you will often find a homogenous team, a team who mainly hold majority identities.

So how are the trainers, the mentors and the coaches being trained to become conscious of their own identity, to become confident in addressing their own privilege and to become confident in disrupting bias in the many forms through which it can manifest?

How trauma-informed are the trainers, the mentors and the coaches in supporting individuals who have experienced identity-based harm?    

The Church of England Foundation for Educational Leadership launched a brilliant pipeline programme to nurture leaders from a global majority background called Leaders Like Us a couple of years ago, in partnership with Aspiring Heads and the Institute for Educational & Social Equity.  This programme is a gamechanger for our education system and our future workforce.

So let’s all consider what Trainers… Mentors… Coaches … ‘Like Us’ would look like.

If we put a spotlight on ‘Coaches Like Us’ as a school, college, trust, SCITT, Teaching School Hub and localities we need to ask ourselves:

  • Who gets to be coached?
  • Who gets to be The Coach?
  • Who gets invested in?  
  • Who gets nurtured to flourish? 
  • Who gets supported to progress?

And most importantly, do people get to choose their coach? Or what has become a common phenomenon – does a coach get chosen for them? 

Coaching is about creating a safe space. About having a confidential conversation. About exploring how one is feeling. About being vulnerable and open. If your coach is your line manager or someone you work closely with – someone who might appraise your performance or sit on a promotion panel – we are in muddy waters.   

What difference would it make for an aspiring leader to self-select a coach who resonates with them? A coach who shares their identity? A coach who has walked their walk?

Some final thoughts:

  • How might being coached or becoming a coach help diverse educators stay in the system?
  • How might being coached or becoming a coach help diverse leaders climb up the leadership ladder? 
  • How might being coached or becoming a coach help us tackle the glass ceiling and the concrete ceiling in the education system? 

To help our clients, who have asked for our support in diversifying their coaching pools, we have created a #DiverseEd Coaching Directory:

  • You can find 25+ coaching profiles here.
  • You can meet our coaches through our video gallery here.
  • Get in touch if you are a coach who would like to be added or if you are looking for a coach and would like to be connected here. 

         

by Hannah Wilson

Section 28: 20 Years On

Hannah Wilson portrait

Written by Hannah Wilson

Founder of Diverse Educators

Yesterday marked 20 years since Section 28 was repealed whilst also celebrating Trans Awareness Week. There is a brilliant thread on X here breaking down the key information all educators should know about this piece of problematic legislation which weaponised an identity group.

20 years ago, I had joined the teaching profession as a NQT at a boys’ school in Kent.

Homophobia was an issue.

I cannot remember having any training on my PGCE or in my NQT year about prejudice-based behaviour.

I cannot remember Section 28 being mentioned in either training programmes either.

After a year, I moved to London for a Head of Year role at a boys’ school in Surrey.

Homophobia was an issue.

But I felt more empowered to tackle it and I delivered the ‘Some People Are Gay – Get Over It! assemblies from Stonewall.

After three years, I then moved to a co-ed school in Mitcham.

Homophobia was an issue.

But we had strong whole school behaviour systems and consistent accountability so we tried to keep on top of it.

I also leveraged my pastoral and my curriculum leadership responsibilities to educate and to challenge the attitudes of our students.

After six years, I moved to a co-ed school in Morden as a Senior Leader (still in the same trust).

Homophobia was an issue.

But we had zero tolerance to discrimination and robust behaviour systems in place so we chipped away at it.

Three years later I relocated to Oxfordshire to be a Headteacher of a secondary school and Executive Headteacher of a primary school.

Homophobia was an issue.

But as a Headteacher with a committed SLT and visible role models, we hit it head on.

One of my favourite assembly moments in my twenty years in education was Bennie’s coming out assembly at our school. The courage and vulnerability she embodied as she shared the personal impact of the harmful attitudes, language and behaviour humanised the problem. We braced ourselves for the fallout, for the criticisms, but she was instead enveloped with love and respect by our community instead.

20 years on… six schools later…

Thousands of students… thousands of staff… thousands of parents and carers…

Homophobia was an issue – in every context, in every community, to a lesser or greater extent we have had to tackle prejudice and discrimination directed explicitly at the LGBTQ+ community.

Since leaving headship I have run a PGCE, consulted for national organisations, trained staff in schools, colleges and trusts (in the UK and internationally), coached senior leaders.

I am not a LGBTQ+ trainer – we have experts with lived experience who train on that. I speak about DEI strategy, inclusive cultures, inclusive language, inclusive behaviours and belonging. Yet, in every training session the experience of the LGBQT+ community comes up. It comes up especially with educators who started their careers in schools pre-2003 who talk about the shadow it has cast over them. It comes up with those starting their careers in schools asking when at interview you can ask if it is okay to be out.

Section 28 may have been repealed, we may be 20 years on, but have we really made any progress when it comes to tackling homophobia in our schools, in our communities and in our society?

Homophobia was and still is an issue.

As a cisgender, heterosexual woman homophobia has not personally impacted me. I have never had to hide my sexuality. I have been able to talk openly about who I am in a relationship with. I have not had to navigate assumptions, bias nor prejudice when it comes to who I date, who I love and who I commit to. This is a privilege I am aware of, but that I have also taken for granted.

A ‘big gay assembly’ may have been one of my professional highlights, but one of my personal low points was going on a night out to a gay club in Brighton in my early thirties, and my gay male friend being beaten up in the toilets in a supposed safe space by a homophobic straight man.

This is the reality for a lot of people I care about. Family, friends and colleagues who do not feel safe in our society. Members of my network who often do not feel safe in our schools.

It is our duty to ensure that our schools, our system and our society are safe for people to just be.

To be themselves… to be accepted… to be out at work (should they wish to be)… to be in love… to be able to talk about their relationships and their families…

It is our duty to ensure that we see progress in the next 20 years – as we are seeing a scary global regression of LGBTQ+ rights.

It is our duty to counter the current rhetoric – especially when it comes from our politicians who are weaponizing the LGBQT+ community.

It is our duty to challenge the haters and the trolls – if we as educators do not tackle it, then who else will?

Our gay students, staff, parents and carers need us to be allies. They need us to stand up, to speak out and to say this is not okay, this is enough.

Some signposting for organisations and resources to support you and your school:

Partnerships:

  • Schools Out UK – they run LGBT History month and we collaborate on activities.
  • Educate and Celebrate – they ran our LGBTQ+ training and school award for us.
  • LGBTed – we hosted their launch at our very first #DiverseEd event.
  • No Outsiders – we collaborate with them and celebrate their work.
  • Pride and Progress – we partner with them and support their work.
  • Just Like Us – we collaborate with them and amplify their Inclusion Week.
  • Diversity Role Models – we collaborate with them and amplify their great resources.
  • There are lots of other brilliant organisations and individuals working this space listed in our DEI Directory here.

Communities:

Books:

Podcasts:

Blogs:

Resources:

Training:

by Hannah Wilson

Why students should be taught the truth about Remembrance

Selena Carty portrait

Written by Selena Carty

Cultural and Ancestral Genealogist, Global War Heritage Specialist, Identity and Empowerment Consultant and Founder of BlackPoppyRose.

I was recently asked by the British Army to contribute to its new set of school resources on Remembrance. As the founder of BlackPoppyRose, I accepted the opportunity. My aims are to enlighten all people of the contributions of African, Black, West Indian, Caribbean Pacific Islands and Indigenous communities to history in wars/revolutions and rebellions.  

So, let me ask you a question: How do you mark Remembrance Day? For me, I remember Albert Carty who served in World War I in the No’2 Construction Battalion. After arriving in the UK, he travelled across England and Scotland as part of the lumberjack battalion. He returned home after the war and became a father to seven sons. Five went on to join the Royal Canadian Airforce and served in World War II. The remembrance of families doing their part in a world that had set so many apart.

Remembrance means a connection to yesterday and the yesterdays before yesterday, which brings light the relevance of our actions today. When I think about Remembrance, I think of my mother, father, grandparents and great grandparents. I think about the legacies of family. I wouldn’t be here today if it were not for the efforts made by those who made choices before I came into existence. 

There is a crucial need to improve how we explain the significance of Remembrance to young people, especially in the UK. We live in a cosmopolitan modern world where everything is moving a lot faster than I remember. Everything is now! (Like Amazon Prime deliveries, with no understanding of the framework, planning and years of innovation to make this happen.) 

The legacies that have built the worlds we see today are very often under-educated, misinterpreted or omitted. The more we do to encourage Remembrance will allow us to come together with our own unique stories and share the impacts that the changing worlds and legacies before us have had and will still have on us in the present and near future. 

To know that you are connected to something that has passed is significant to why we are here, why we speak the languages we do, why our names are what they are, why we can call more than one place our home or ancestral homes, and even the accessibility to the music that we listen to. All this enables each of us to have a unique perspective about Remembrance that we all benefit from. 

Where should children start to learn about their past? With their immediate families as well as their peers and friends’ parent are also potential sources of information teachers. Additionally, organisations like BlackPoppyRose can help point them in the right direction. We also encourage students to check their local libraries, bookshops, museums, galleries and archives as well as the internet by using key phrases or tags.

So, what more can schools do to teach pupils about Remembrance? Tell the truth about what you know. We all have a version of ‘truth’. Telling the truth resonates stronger than untruths as it allows us to identify with the world we currently live in and the legacies we have inherited from the past. It will help to understand the choices made by so many in uncertain times. We cannot change the past, but we can be open and honest about what has happened, allowing us all to work together to find improvements on things that are pre-existing and still affecting us all today.

The British Army has created a library of resources for secondary schools. To access its Remembrance resource, visit  https://tinyurl.com/ye2928v7

by Hannah Wilson